These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15068572)
1. How to revise an article. Morse JM Qual Health Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 15068572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning to review. Freedman R J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript. Valente S Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16189960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside. Fisher RS; Powers LE Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Writing a feature article: not all articles are alike. Pelletier LR Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 14562512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consider the source. Mason DJ Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection]. Clarke SP Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "It's déjà vu all over again". Greenebaum B Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Dec; 24(8):529-30. PubMed ID: 14603471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review of NZMJ articles: issues raised after publication of the viewpoint article on Janet Frame. Frizelle FA N Z Med J; 2007 Oct; 120(1264):U2788; discussion U2787. PubMed ID: 17972995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements. van Loon AJ Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review. Rossdale PD Equine Vet J; 2010 May; 42(4):283. PubMed ID: 20525041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Talking back to reviewers: the gentle art of resubmission. O'Connell KA J Prof Nurs; 2001; 17(6):276. PubMed ID: 11712110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes. Froman RD Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ten simple rules for getting published. Bourne PE PLoS Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 1(5):e57. PubMed ID: 16261197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]