These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15068572)

  • 1. How to revise an article.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 15068572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning to review.
    Freedman R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript.
    Valente S
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16189960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
    Fisher RS; Powers LE
    Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Writing a feature article: not all articles are alike.
    Pelletier LR
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 14562512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "It's déjà vu all over again".
    Greenebaum B
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Dec; 24(8):529-30. PubMed ID: 14603471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review of NZMJ articles: issues raised after publication of the viewpoint article on Janet Frame.
    Frizelle FA
    N Z Med J; 2007 Oct; 120(1264):U2788; discussion U2787. PubMed ID: 17972995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative peer review system: Peer agreement system.
    Loonen MP
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1931-2. PubMed ID: 20381440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review.
    Rossdale PD
    Equine Vet J; 2010 May; 42(4):283. PubMed ID: 20525041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talking back to reviewers: the gentle art of resubmission.
    O'Connell KA
    J Prof Nurs; 2001; 17(6):276. PubMed ID: 11712110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ten simple rules for getting published.
    Bourne PE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 1(5):e57. PubMed ID: 16261197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review and fraud.
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):971-2. PubMed ID: 17183274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentaries on peer review and the evolving journal.
    Freeman MP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1598. PubMed ID: 20031099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.