These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15069149)
1. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem. Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size. Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem. Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20828697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral stem surface finish, collar and cement thickness on load transfer to the femur. Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Morrison BJ; Dorr LD J Appl Biomater Biomech; 2003; 1(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 20803475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle. Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations. Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface finish mechanics explain different clinical survivorship of cemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty. Beksac B; Taveras NA; Valle AG; Salvati EA J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(6):407-22. PubMed ID: 17956208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement. Fisher DA; Tsang AC; Paydar N; Milionis S; Turner CH J Biomech; 1997; 30(11-12):1173-7. PubMed ID: 9456387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish. Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of cement mantles in collared versus collarless femoral components. Mahoney CR; Yun AG; Pellicci PM Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 May; 35(5):235-6. PubMed ID: 16764183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components]. Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses. Ramos A; Simões JA J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cement Mantle Quality and Stem Alignment in Cemented Collarless Polished Tapered Stems Implanted via the Direct Anterior and Direct Lateral Approaches: A Single Institution Experience. Pomeroy E; McGoldrick NP; Moody PW; Vasarhelyi EM; McCalden RW; Lanting BA J Arthroplasty; 2022 Nov; 37(11):2208-2213. PubMed ID: 35580767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing. O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polished vs rough femoral components in grade A and grade C-2 cement mantles. Duffy GP; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 17027551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems. Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Huiskes R; Verdonschot N; Nivbrant B Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):103-12. PubMed ID: 9917595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro measurement of interface micromotion and crack in cemented total hip arthroplasty systems with different surface roughness. Choi D; Park Y; Yoon YS; Masri BA Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Jan; 25(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 19744754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems. Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]