186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15070253)
21. An automatic mass detection system in mammograms based on complex texture features.
Tai SC; Chen ZS; Tsai WT
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Mar; 18(2):618-27. PubMed ID: 24608061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):516-26. PubMed ID: 9571620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.
Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Keller BM; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Conant EF; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5862. PubMed ID: 27806604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls.
Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Janardanan J; Sennett CA
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2014 Oct; 1(3):031009. PubMed ID: 26158050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis.
Sun W; Tseng TL; Qian W; Zhang J; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Lure F; Yu H; Zhou S
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2853-62. PubMed ID: 26127038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlative feature analysis on FFDM.
Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Sennett C
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5490-500. PubMed ID: 19175108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers.
Li H; Giger ML; Sun C; Ponsukcharoen U; Huo D; Lan L; Olopade OI; Jamieson AR; Brown JB; Di Rienzo A
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031917. PubMed ID: 24593735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Gurcan M
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2309-17. PubMed ID: 11764038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.
Tourassi GD; Vargas-Voracek R; Catarious DM; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 12945977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mammography screening and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective study.
Giannakeas V; Lubinski J; Gronwald J; Moller P; Armel S; Lynch HT; Foulkes WD; Kim-Sing C; Singer C; Neuhausen SL; Friedman E; Tung N; Senter L; Sun P; Narod SA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Aug; 147(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 25082516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space.
Chan HP; Wei D; Helvie MA; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM; Petrick N
Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):857-76. PubMed ID: 7652012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound.
Häberle L; Hack CC; Heusinger K; Wagner F; Jud SM; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T; Fasching PA
Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 28854966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer.
Schrading S; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 18096529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.
Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
