These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15070802)

  • 1. The Canadian C-spine rule.
    Mower WR; Wolfson AB; Hoffman JR; Todd KH
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1467-9; author reply 1467-9. PubMed ID: 15070802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Canadian C-spine rule.
    Hall FM
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1467-9; author reply 1467-9. PubMed ID: 15074005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma.
    Stiell IG; Clement CM; McKnight RD; Brison R; Schull MJ; Rowe BH; Worthington JR; Eisenhauer MA; Cass D; Greenberg G; MacPhail I; Dreyer J; Lee JS; Bandiera G; Reardon M; Holroyd B; Lesiuk H; Wells GA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Dec; 349(26):2510-8. PubMed ID: 14695411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing between clinical prediction rules.
    Yealy DM; Auble TE
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Dec; 349(26):2553-5. PubMed ID: 14695417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying patients at low risk for cervical spine injury: the Canadian C-spine rule for radiography.
    Daffner RH
    JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(15):1893-4. PubMed ID: 11597293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.
    Stiell IG; Wells GA; Vandemheen KL; Clement CM; Lesiuk H; De Maio VJ; Laupacis A; Schull M; McKnight RD; Verbeek R; Brison R; Cass D; Dreyer J; Eisenhauer MA; Greenberg GH; MacPhail I; Morrison L; Reardon M; Worthington J
    JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(15):1841-8. PubMed ID: 11597285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculated decisions: Canadian c-spine rule.
    Runde D
    Emerg Med Pract; 2020 Aug; 22(Suppl 8):CD3-CD4. PubMed ID: 32805098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Canadian C-spine Rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Low-Risk Criteria for C-spine radiography in young trauma patients.
    Ehrlich PF; Wee C; Drongowski R; Rana AR
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 May; 44(5):987-91. PubMed ID: 19433184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does applying the Canadian Cervical Spine rule reduce cervical spine radiography rates in alert patients with blunt trauma to the neck? A retrospective analysis.
    Rethnam U; Yesupalan R; Gandham G
    BMC Med Imaging; 2008 Jun; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18557998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How accurate is the Canadian C-spine rule for the detection of clinically significant cervical spine injuries?
    Kinkade MT; Lindbloom EJ
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jan; 51(1):10. PubMed ID: 11927052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.
    Vaillancourt C; Stiell IG; Beaudoin T; Maloney J; Anton AR; Bradford P; Cain E; Travers A; Stempien M; Lees M; Munkley D; Battram E; Banek J; Wells GA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 54(5):663-671.e1. PubMed ID: 19394111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule reduces cervical spine x-ray rate for alert patients with potential neck injury.
    Kerr D; Bradshaw L; Kelly AM
    J Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 28(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 15707805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical criteria to rule out cervical-spine injury.
    April RS; Lanfranchi R
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(18):1339. PubMed ID: 11183569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical images: burst fracture in "flowing wax" spine.
    Choi SJ; Lee YH; Woo JH; Lee YH; Ji JD; Song GG
    Arthritis Rheum; 2010 Feb; 62(2):440. PubMed ID: 20112384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing NEXUS and Canadian C-Spine decision rules for determining the need for cervical spine radiography.
    Knopp R
    Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Apr; 43(4):518-20. PubMed ID: 15039697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is MRI essential in C-spine clearance in the obtunded patients with blunt trauma?
    McKee M
    J Trauma; 2008 Feb; 64(2):540-1; author reply 541. PubMed ID: 18301229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The answer is on! A response to the initial lateral cervical spine film for the athlete with a suspected neck injury: helmet and shoulder pads on or off?
    Kleiner DM
    Clin J Sport Med; 2003 Jan; 13(1):57-8; author reply 58. PubMed ID: 12544167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The initial lateral cervical spine film for the athlete with a suspected neck injury: helmet and shoulder pads on or off?
    Veenema K; Greenwald R; Kamali M; Freedman A; Spillane L
    Clin J Sport Med; 2002 Mar; 12(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 11953560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical decision rules and cervical spine injury in an elderly patient: a word of caution.
    Barry TB; McNamara RM
    J Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 29(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 16243202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group.
    Hoffman JR; Mower WR; Wolfson AB; Todd KH; Zucker MI
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Jul; 343(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 10891516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.