These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods. Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comment on some aspects of chromosome aberration analysis for radiation accident dosimetry. Jin C J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():258-9. PubMed ID: 1507176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological and physical dosimetry after a radiation accident. Dolphin GW; Bolton D; Humphreys DL; Speight DL; Stradling GN Nature; 1970 Jul; 227(5254):165. PubMed ID: 5428403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay. Romm H; Oestreicher U; Kulka U Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2009; 45(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 19861729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological indicators for the identification of ionizing radiation exposure in humans. Amundson SA; Bittner M; Meltzer P; Trent J; Fornace AJ Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2001 Jul; 1(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 11901816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of cytogenetic indicators in radiobiology. Rodrigues AS; Oliveira NG; Gil OM; Léonard A; Rueff J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):455-60. PubMed ID: 16381766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytogenetic biomonitoring of human radiation exposures: possibilities, problems and pitfalls. Sasaki MS J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():44-53. PubMed ID: 1507178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytogenetic damage in lymphocytes for the purpose of dose reconstruction: a review of three recent radiation accidents. Wojcik A; Gregoire E; Hayata I; Roy L; Sommer S; Stephan G; Voisin P Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):200-5. PubMed ID: 15162038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflections on the past, present and future of automated aberration scoring systems for radiation dosimetry. Rutovitz D J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():1-30. PubMed ID: 1507162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Blood dosimetry and dose-rate effects after radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer. Lassmann M; Luster M; Hänscheid H; Reiners C J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):899. PubMed ID: 15872368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Issues in cytogenetic biological dosimetry: emphasis on radiation environments in space. Straume T; Bender MA Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S60-70. PubMed ID: 9355858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytogenetic damage in americium poisoning. Kelly S; Dagle A N Y State J Med; 1974 Aug; 74(9):1597-8. PubMed ID: 4526619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cytogenetic control in exposure to ionizing radiation sources (review of literature)]. Nugis VIu Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2006; (10):30-6. PubMed ID: 17136843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. International symposium: Automated analysis of radiation induced chromosome aberrations. Tokyo, July 3-4, 1991. J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():1-259. PubMed ID: 1354746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of Cytogenetic analysis of restoration workers for Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident. Suto Y Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 27473701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Results of cytogenetic studies of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident]. Sevan'kaev AV Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2000; 40(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 11252234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biological indication and dosimetry of unstable chromosome aberration frequencies in human lymphocytes]. Baryliak IR; D'omina EA Tsitol Genet; 2004; 38(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 15098451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why can't we find a better biological indicator of dose? Voisin P; Roy L; Benderitter M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(4):465-9. PubMed ID: 15623880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]