These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15072435)

  • 1. Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking.
    Bursulaya BD; Totrov M; Abagyan R; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003 Nov; 17(11):755-63. PubMed ID: 15072435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
    Kramer B; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    Proteins; 1999 Nov; 37(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 10584068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. pso@autodock: a fast flexible molecular docking program based on Swarm intelligence.
    Namasivayam V; Günther R
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Dec; 70(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 17986206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
    Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening.
    Park H; Lee J; Lee S
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A fast protein-ligand docking algorithm based on hydrogen bond matching and surface shape complementarity.
    Luo W; Pei J; Zhu Y
    J Mol Model; 2010 May; 16(5):903-13. PubMed ID: 19823881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexible docking under pharmacophore type constraints.
    Hindle SA; Rarey M; Buning C; Lengaue T
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Feb; 16(2):129-49. PubMed ID: 12188022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FIPSDock: a new molecular docking technique driven by fully informed swarm optimization algorithm.
    Liu Y; Zhao L; Li W; Zhao D; Song M; Yang Y
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Jan; 34(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22961860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SODOCK: swarm optimization for highly flexible protein-ligand docking.
    Chen HM; Liu BF; Huang HL; Hwang SF; Ho SY
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jan; 28(2):612-23. PubMed ID: 17186483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved FlexX docking using FlexS-determined base fragment placement.
    Cross SS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):993-1001. PubMed ID: 16045293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative to consensus scoring--a new approach toward the qualitative combination of docking algorithms.
    Wolf A; Zimmermann M; Hofmann-Apitius M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):1036-44. PubMed ID: 17492829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two implementations of the incremental construction algorithm in flexible docking of thrombin inhibitors.
    Knegtel RM; Bayada DM; Engh RA; von der Saal W; van Geerestein VJ; Grootenhuis PD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1999 Mar; 13(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 10091122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FlexX-Scan: fast, structure-based virtual screening.
    Schellhammer I; Rarey M
    Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(3):504-17. PubMed ID: 15382244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Docking of hydrophobic ligands with interaction-based matching algorithms.
    Rarey M; Kramer B; Lengauer T
    Bioinformatics; 1999 Mar; 15(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 10222412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening.
    Kontoyianni M; Sokol GS; McClellan LM
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Jan; 26(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 15526325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.