349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15072893)
1. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Anderson JK; Murdock A; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y
Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 16140077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A single-institution comparison between radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy on perioperative and pathological outcomes for obese men: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database.
Fitzsimons NJ; Sun LL; Dahm P; Moul JW; Madden J; Gan TJ; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1146-51. PubMed ID: 18158036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Gillitzer R; Thomas C; Wiesner C; Jones J; Schmidt F; Hampel C; Brenner W; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 19969328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Making ends meet: a cost comparison of laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Link RE; Su LM; Bhayani SB; Pavlovich CP
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):269-74. PubMed ID: 15201792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
Mirzapour K; de Geeter P; Löhmer H; Albers P
Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences among patients undergoing perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy in pain and perioperative variables: a prospective study.
Paiva CS; Andreoni C; Cunha GP; Khalil W; Ortiz V
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1219-26. PubMed ID: 19389007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inguinal hernia after radical perineal prostatectomy: comparison with the retropubic approach.
Matsubara A; Yoneda T; Nakamoto T; Maruyama S; Koda S; Goto K; Teishima J; Shiina H; Igawa M; Usui T
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 18158037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative hospital cost-analysis of open and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Tomaszewski JJ; Matchett JC; Davies BJ; Jackman SV; Hrebinko RL; Nelson JB
Urology; 2012 Jul; 80(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 22608294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Celioscopic lymphatic excision and perineal radical prostatectomy: a strategy for the treatment of prostatic cancer].
Melman A; Gladshteyn M; Stifelman M
Prog Urol; 1993 Apr; 3(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 8508202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical retropubic vs. radical perineal prostatectomy: a comparison of relative benefits in four urban hospitals.
May M; Dorst M; May J; Hoschke B; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Siegsmund M
Urol Nurs; 2007 Dec; 27(6):519-26. PubMed ID: 18217535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Albala DM; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Moul JW
BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-sectional survey of long-term quality of life after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Yang BK; Crisci A; Young MD; Silverstein AD; Peterson BL; Dahm P
Urology; 2005 Jan; 65(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 15667876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
