351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15072893)
21. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Goetzl MA; Krebill R; Griebling TL; Thrasher JB
Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.
Yates J; Haleblian G; Stein B; Miller B; Renzulli J; Pareek G
Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4842-6. PubMed ID: 19796462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Natural history of disease progression in patients who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level after undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Rogers CG; Khan MA; Craig Miller M; Veltri RW; Partin AW
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 101(11):2549-56. PubMed ID: 15470681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radical perineal prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostate cancer in obese and nonobese patients: a matched control study.
Yang BK; Gan TJ; Salmen CR; Cancel QV; Vieweg J; Dahm P
Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):990-5. PubMed ID: 16635511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Brown JA; Garlitz C; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Diamond SM; Strup SE
Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15082005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
D'Alonzo RC; Gan TJ; Moul JW; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Robertson CN; Sun L; Dahm P; Habib AS
J Clin Anesth; 2009 Aug; 21(5):322-8. PubMed ID: 19700296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Multivariate analysis on radical retropubic prostatectomy associated blood loss: importance of prostate size, pelvic lymph-node dissection and percentage of carcinoma].
Stav K; Rahimi-Levene N; Shilo Y; Korenberg A; Lindner A; Zisman A
Harefuah; 2006 Feb; 145(2):103-6, 166-7. PubMed ID: 16509412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Perineal radical prostatectomy as monotherapy: ten-year experience].
Martínez de la Riva SI; López-Tomasety JB; Marrero Domínguez R; Santamaría Blanco P
Arch Esp Urol; 2004 May; 57(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 15270282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.
Sengupta S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Myers RP; Riehle DL; Pankratz VS; Blute ML; Sebo TJ
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Schumacher MC; Burkhard FC; Thalmann GN; Fleischmann A; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2008 Aug; 54(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 18511183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins.
Cannon GM; Pound CR; Landsittel DP; Bastacky SI; Dhir R; Becich MJ; Nelson JB
Prostate; 2005 Jun; 63(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 15602747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy at Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand: a retrospective review.
Kongcharoensombat W; Tantirangsee N; Chaimuangraj S; Leelanuphun C; Kochakarn W; Patcharatrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95(8):1035-40. PubMed ID: 23061307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictors of costs for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Bolenz C; Gupta A; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 21555102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radical perineal prostatectomy and simultaneous extended pelvic lymph node dissection via the same incision.
Keller H; Lehmann J; Beier J
Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 17084507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.
Krambeck AE; DiMarco DS; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Myers RP; Blute ML; Gettman MT
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 18778350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
