244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15073341)
1. Scholarly publishing. U.S. eases the squeeze on 'sanctioned' authors.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5668):187. PubMed ID: 15073341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A welcome retreat at Treasury.
Kennedy D
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5668):171. PubMed ID: 15073338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Publishing. U.S. trade policy creates confusion over co-authorship.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5676):1422. PubMed ID: 15178769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Extension of US trade embargoes to science editing.
Habibzadeh F
Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9415):1160. PubMed ID: 15064039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific publishing. Suit seeks to ease trade embargo rules.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5693):30. PubMed ID: 15459355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trading scientific freedom.
Nat Med; 2004 Feb; 10(2):107. PubMed ID: 14760395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific publishing. Society bars papers from Iranian authors.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1722-3. PubMed ID: 15961635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A perspective on scientific peer review for informing regulatory decisions: making sure peer review makes a difference.
Greenbaum D
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16492174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. trade policy. Editing ban to be eased, but Cuban travel blocked.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5665):1742. PubMed ID: 15031462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific publishing. Editing no longer infringes U.S. trade sanctions.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5705):2170. PubMed ID: 15618493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. blockade of a conference in Cuba.
Miles SH
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5668):207. PubMed ID: 15073355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies.
Cozzarelli NR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(15):5303. PubMed ID: 15809413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions.
Patton DE; Olin SS
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 16492173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scholarly publishing. Bill would require free public access to research papers.
Kaiser J
Science; 2006 May; 312(5775):828. PubMed ID: 16690825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The public-access movement.
Paquette M
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2005; 41(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 15924574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Online archive must serve authors as well as publishers.
Harnad S
Nature; 1999 Sep; 401(6752):423. PubMed ID: 10519533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What authors need to know about the way editors think: report from the congress on peer review in biomedical publication.
Neale AV
Fam Med; 2002 Feb; 34(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 11874024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Publishers split over response to US trade embargo ruling.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6976):663. PubMed ID: 14973440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
