244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15073341)
21. US officials urge biologists to vet publications for bioterror risk.
Check E
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):197. PubMed ID: 12529597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Disclosure and disinterest.
Kennedy D
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5654):15. PubMed ID: 14704397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Scientific publishing. U.S. license needed to edit Iranian papers.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5643):210. PubMed ID: 14551410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. US societies to defy ban on editing articles from embargoed countries.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7439):543. PubMed ID: 15132124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. US pressures publishers to honor trade embargoes.
Wickware P
Nat Med; 2004 Feb; 10(2):109. PubMed ID: 14760397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. E-biomed may launch by end of year.
D'Auria J
J Investig Med; 1999 Jul; 47(6):267-8. PubMed ID: 10431480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Publication of science, terror, and the first amendment.
McCool WF
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(4):281-2. PubMed ID: 15236706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Scientific publishing. U.S. output flattens, and NSF wonders why.
Mervis J
Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5838):582. PubMed ID: 17673627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
HEART Group
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Authorship of scientific articles].
Højgaard L
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Jun; 160(25):3693. PubMed ID: 9641051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Commentary on scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: roles and perspectives of scientists.
Omenn GS
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 16492178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Geopolitics and the CJU.
Klotz LH
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2169-70. PubMed ID: 15189573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Scholarly publishing. House weighs proposal to block mandatory 'Open Access'.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5896):1621. PubMed ID: 18801977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [A clever idiot?].
Agewall S
Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(4):250. PubMed ID: 12580014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. U.S. science policy. Report tells NSF to think more boldly.
Mervis J
Science; 2007 Mar; 315(5817):1352-3. PubMed ID: 17347421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Commentary on "scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions".
Yosie TF
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 16492179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. U.S. agricultural research. Report, lawmaker promote an independent institute.
Stokstad E
Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5703):1879. PubMed ID: 15591177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Public access failure at PubMed.
Stebbins M; Davis E; Royland L; White G
Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5783):43. PubMed ID: 16825550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
