244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15073341)
41. Your copyright and the SPARC author addendum.
Turpin DL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):1. PubMed ID: 20122410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Biomedical agency floats open-access plan.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7005):115. PubMed ID: 15356593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Scientific publishing. Seeking advice on 'open access,' NIH gets an earful.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5685):764. PubMed ID: 15297639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters.
Hoffmann R
Nat Genet; 2008 Sep; 40(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 18728691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Preventing inequity in international research.
Rudan I
Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5868):1336-7; author reply 1336-7. PubMed ID: 18323433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. U.S. science funding. DOE cures pork project with peer review.
Kintisch E
Science; 2007 May; 316(5825):674. PubMed ID: 17478687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Personal computers spur drive to keep control over copyright.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6709):293. PubMed ID: 9845057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Scientific publishing. PNAS nixes special privileges for (most) papers.
Kean S
Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5947):1486-7. PubMed ID: 19762615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Biomedicine's electronic publishing paradigm shift: copyright policy and PubMed Central.
Markovitz BP
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2000; 7(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10833158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
Banks M
J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Scientific manuscripts: the fun of writing and submitting.
El-Serag HB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S19-22. PubMed ID: 17113848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Scientific publishing. NIH proposes 6-month public access to papers.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1548. PubMed ID: 15361594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Legislating peer review in the Endangered Species Act.
Male T
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 16492177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
Lawler A; Mervis J
Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Speaking out about U.S. science output.
Moore JP
Science; 2007 Nov; 318(5852):913. PubMed ID: 17991842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Bioterrorism. Panel provides peer review of intelligence research.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2007 Dec; 318(5856):1538. PubMed ID: 18063763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Science and regulation. A White House mandate for more peer review.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5638):1307. PubMed ID: 12958338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Tariffs on Chinese medical products could pose problems for supply chain.
Alkire M
Mater Manag Health Care; 2010 Jan; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 20178235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
