These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15073478)
21. A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Taylor K; La Rotta G; McCrindle BW; Manlhiot C; Redington A; Holtby H J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):776-9. PubMed ID: 21684761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and Efficacy of Impedance Cardiography as a Non-Invasive Cardiac Function Monitor. Kim GE; Kim SY; Kim SJ; Yun SY; Jung HH; Kang YS; Koo BN Yonsei Med J; 2019 Aug; 60(8):735-741. PubMed ID: 31347328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Determination of cardiac output by the Fick method, thermodilution, and acetylene rebreathing in pulmonary hypertension. Hoeper MM; Maier R; Tongers J; Niedermeyer J; Hohlfeld JM; Hamm M; Fabel H Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1999 Aug; 160(2):535-41. PubMed ID: 10430725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output. Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Noninvasive cardiac output measurements in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Rich JD; Archer SL; Rich S Eur Respir J; 2013 Jul; 42(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 23100501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods. Thrush D; Downs JB; Smith RA J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1995 Aug; 9(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 7579109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative study of cardiac output measurement by regional impedance cardiography and thermodilution method in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Guha A; Arora D; Mehta Y Ann Card Anaesth; 2022; 25(3):335-342. PubMed ID: 35799563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measuring Flow Hemodynamic Indices and Oxygen Consumption in Children with Pulmonary Hypertension: A Comparison of Catheterization and Phase-Contrast MRI. Schäfer M; Truong U; Browne LP; Morgan GJ; Ross M; Ing R; Hunter KS; Kheyfets VO; Abman SH; Ivy DD; Wilson N Pediatr Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 39(2):268-274. PubMed ID: 29043395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of cardiac output measurements by arterial trans-cardiopulmonary and pulmonary arterial thermodilution with direct Fick in septic shock. Marx G; Schuerholz T; Sümpelmann R; Simon T; Leuwer M Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Feb; 22(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15816592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Thermodilution and Fick cardiac outputs differ: impact on pulmonary hypertension evaluation. Fares WH; Blanchard SK; Stouffer GA; Chang PP; Rosamond WD; Ford HJ; Aris RM Can Respir J; 2012; 19(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 22891186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, CO2-rebreathing and the direct Fick method. Espersen K; Jensen EW; Rosenborg D; Thomsen JK; Eliasen K; Olsen NV; Kanstrup IL Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1995 Feb; 39(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 7793193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Belardinelli R; Ciampani N; Costantini C; Blandini A; Purcaro A Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 77(15):1293-301. PubMed ID: 8677869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements]. Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation. Spahn DR; Schmid ER; Tornic M; Jenni R; von Segesser L; Turina M; Baetscher A J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 2131856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods. Yakimets J; Jensen L Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 7622393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The measurement of cardiac output in dogs by impedance cardiography with different electrode arrangements. Adamicza A; Tutsek L; Daróczy B; Bari F; Nagy S Acta Physiol Hung; 1994; 82(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 7976395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cardiac Output Assessment in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Device: Discordance Between Thermodilution and Indirect Fick Cardiac Output Measurements. Tehrani DM; Grinstein J; Kalantari S; Kim G; Sarswat N; Adatya S; Sayer G; Uriel N ASAIO J; 2017; 63(4):433-437. PubMed ID: 28125464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]