These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15074443)

  • 1. A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24 dB to 0 dB signal to babble.
    Wilson RH; Abrams HB; Pillion AL
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 15074443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Nov; 14(9):453-70. PubMed ID: 14708835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
    Wilson RH; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Weakley DG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):367-82. PubMed ID: 16178408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word recognition in multitalker babble measured with two psychophysical methods.
    Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):622-30. PubMed ID: 16295249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word recognition of digit triplets and monosyllabic words in multitalker babble by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):385-97. PubMed ID: 16866003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
    McArdle RA; Wilson RH; Burks CA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):726-39; quiz 763-4. PubMed ID: 16515143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of word-recognition abilities assessed with digit pairs and digit triplets in multitalker babble.
    Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 16320145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.
    Beattie RC; Barr T; Roup C
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 9276098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers.
    Wilson RH; Carnell CS; Cleghorn AL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):522-9. PubMed ID: 17849640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness as a cue for acceptable noise levels.
    Recker KL; McKinney MF; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):605-23. PubMed ID: 25313550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Jain C; Konadath S; Vimal BM; Suresh V
    Audiol Res; 2014 Mar; 4(1):89. PubMed ID: 26557350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.