These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15076736)

  • 21. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The right hemisphere is independent from the left hemisphere in allocating visuospatial attention.
    Zuanazzi A; Cattaneo L
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():197-205. PubMed ID: 28602998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.
    Roth HL; Lora AN; Heilman KM
    Brain; 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2023-35. PubMed ID: 12183348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissecting the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) phenotype: sustained attention, response variability and spatial attentional asymmetries in relation to dopamine transporter (DAT1) genotype.
    Bellgrove MA; Hawi Z; Kirley A; Gill M; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1847-57. PubMed ID: 16168728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.
    Zago L; Petit L; Mellet E; Jobard G; Crivello F; Joliot M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt B):394-406. PubMed ID: 26626612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.
    Okubo M; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16418850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatially specific and non-lateralised attention deficits in patients with perceptual and premotor neglect.
    de Los Angeles Hoffmann M; Gall C; Kaufmann C; Fydrich T; Kasten E; Sabel B
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2011; 28(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 21447913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of attentional load on spatial attention in acquired and developmental disorders of attention.
    Bellgrove MA; Eramudugolla R; Newman DP; Vance A; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 May; 51(6):1085-93. PubMed ID: 23391561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL; Bradshaw JA
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1994 Oct; 57(10):1228-35. PubMed ID: 7931385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of focal and global attentional systems on spatial biases.
    Powers RM; Roth HL; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15963382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sustained attention training reduces spatial bias in Parkinson's disease: a pilot case series.
    DeGutis J; Grosso M; VanVleet T; Esterman M; Pistorino L; Cronin-Golomb A
    Neurocase; 2016; 22(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 26360648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulation of spatial attention in a child with developmental unilateral neglect.
    Dobler VB; Manly T; Verity C; Woolrych J; Robertson IH
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2003 Apr; 45(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 12647931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prismatic adaptation reduces biased temporal order judgements in spatial neglect.
    Berberovic N; Pisella L; Morris AP; Mattingley JB
    Neuroreport; 2004 May; 15(7):1199-204. PubMed ID: 15129174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections.
    Nicholls ME; McIlroy AM
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 20178955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of spatial attention after brain damage with a dynamic reaction time test.
    Deouell LY; Sacher Y; Soroker N
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2005 Oct; 11(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 16248905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Horizontal line bisections in upper and lower body space.
    Barrett AM; Crosson JB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2000 May; 6(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 10902414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Emotional influences on spatial attention.
    Foster PS; Drago V; Webster DG; Harrison DW; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Jan; 22(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 18211162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right.
    Urbanski M; Bartolomeo P
    Cortex; 2008; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dopamine transporter genotype is associated with a lateralized resistance to distraction during attention selection.
    Newman DP; Cummins TD; Tong JH; Johnson BP; Pickering H; Fanning P; Wagner J; Goodrich JT; Hawi Z; Chambers CD; Bellgrove MA
    J Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 34(47):15743-50. PubMed ID: 25411502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.