These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Motter BC; Simoni DA Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2382-93. PubMed ID: 18722398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmentation by depth does not always facilitate visual search. Finlayson NJ; Remington RW; Retell JD; Grove PM J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23847304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vergence in reverspective: percept-driven versus data-driven eye movement control. Wagner M; Ehrenstein WH; Papathomas TV Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jan; 449(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 18996440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The parallel representation of the objects selected by attention. de-Wit LH; Cole GG; Kentridge RW; Milner AD J Vis; 2011 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 21508268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A proto-object based saliency model in three-dimensional space. Hu B; Kane-Jackson R; Niebur E Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():42-9. PubMed ID: 26739278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Depth modulation of the attentional repulsion effect. Chien SE; Watanabe K Perception; 2013; 42(12):1333-43. PubMed ID: 24649635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parallel visual search is not always effortless. Leonards U; Rettenbach R; Sireteanu R Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Oct; 7(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 9774733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search. Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration. Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Search time critically depends on irrelevant subset size in visual search. Benjamins JS; Hooge IT; van Elst JC; Wertheim AH; Verstraten FA Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 19068222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How does attention spread across objects oriented in depth? Reppa I; Fougnie D; Schmidt WC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):912-25. PubMed ID: 20436189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of perceptual organization while attending in depth. Marrara MT; Moore CM Percept Psychophys; 2000 May; 62(4):786-99. PubMed ID: 10883585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oculomotor control in a sequential search task. Trukenbrod HA; Engbert R Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2426-43. PubMed ID: 17662332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing. Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of crowding in parallel search: Peripheral pooling is not responsible for logarithmic efficiency in parallel search. Madison A; Lleras A; Buetti S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):352-373. PubMed ID: 29143194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]