These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15078048)
1. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes. Tangen JM; Allan LG Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments. Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model. White PA Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure. Vadillo MA; Matute H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymptotic judgment of cause in a relative validity paradigm. Baker AG; Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):466-79. PubMed ID: 10881563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recency and primacy in causal judgments: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction. Glautier S Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 18927027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment. Perales JC; Shanks DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generality of the summation effect in human causal learning. Soto FA; Vogel EH; Castillo RD; Wagner AR Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 19048450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Associative history affects the associative change undergone by both presented and absent cues in human causal learning. LePelley ME; McLaren IP J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 14709116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design. Vandorpe S; De Houwer J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment. White PA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions. Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 19246341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events. Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment. White PA Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]