These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15078307)

  • 1. Ecological risk ranking: development and evaluation of a method for improving public participation in environmental decision making.
    Willis HH; DeKay ML; Morgan MG; Florig HK; Fischbeck PS
    Risk Anal; 2004 Apr; 24(2):363-78. PubMed ID: 15078307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A deliberative method for ranking risks (II): Evaluation of validity and agreement among risk managers.
    Morgan KM; DeKay ML; Fischbeck PS; Morgan MG; Fischhoff B; Florig HK
    Risk Anal; 2001 Oct; 21(5):923-37. PubMed ID: 11798127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aggregate, disaggregate, and hybrid analyses of ecological risk perceptions.
    Willis HH; DeKay ML; Fischhoff B; Morgan MG
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):405-28. PubMed ID: 15876214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A deliberative method for ranking risks (I): Overview and test bed development.
    Florig HK; Morgan MG; Morgan KM; Jenni KE; Fischhoff B; Fischbeck PS; DeKay ML
    Risk Anal; 2001 Oct; 21(5):913-21. PubMed ID: 11798126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorizing risks for risk ranking.
    Morgan MG; Florig HK; DeKay ML; Fischbeck P
    Risk Anal; 2000 Feb; 20(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 10795338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of community deliberation about social impacts of ecological restoration: comparing public input of self-selected versus actively engaged community members.
    Harris CC; Nielsen EA; Becker DR; Blahna DJ; McLaughlin WJ
    Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 50(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 22615108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception.
    Slimak MW; Dietz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1689-705. PubMed ID: 17184406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk ranking: investigating expert and public differences in evaluating food safety hazards.
    Webster K; Jardine C; Cash SB; McMullen LM
    J Food Prot; 2010 Oct; 73(10):1875-85. PubMed ID: 21067676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The roles of group membership, beliefs, and norms in ecological risk perception.
    Willis HH; Dekay ML
    Risk Anal; 2007 Oct; 27(5):1365-80. PubMed ID: 18076502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Prioritization in the Food Domain Using Deliberative and Survey Methods: Differences between Experts and Laypeople.
    Siegrist M; Hübner P; Hartmann C
    Risk Anal; 2018 Mar; 38(3):504-524. PubMed ID: 28675477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Augmenting the Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks.
    Susel I; Lasley T; Montezemolo M; Piper J
    Risk Anal; 2016 Jan; 36(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26224206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Managing environmental risks: the benefits of a place-based approach.
    Loring PA; Duffy LK
    Rural Remote Health; 2011; 11(3):1800. PubMed ID: 21936605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social contagion of risk perceptions in environmental management networks.
    Muter BA; Gore ML; Riley SJ
    Risk Anal; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1489-99. PubMed ID: 23231537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing environmental risks: a consultative approach to setting priorities at the community level.
    Guidotti TL
    Public Health Rev; 1994; 22(3-4):321-37. PubMed ID: 7708943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multiattribute index for assessing environmental impacts of regional development projects: a case study of Korea.
    Kwak SJ; Yoo SH; Shin CO
    Environ Manage; 2002 Feb; 29(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 11815831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont.
    Hermans C; Erickson J; Noordewier T; Sheldon A; Kline M
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):534-46. PubMed ID: 17029759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A look at state-level risk assessment in the United States: making decisions in the absence of federal risk values.
    Effio DG; Kroner O; Maier A; Hayes W; Willis A; Strawson J
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jan; 33(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 22650987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contrast between risk assessment and rules of evidence in the context of international trade disputes: can the US experience inform the process?
    Anderson EL; Hilaire CS
    Risk Anal; 2004 Apr; 24(2):449-59. PubMed ID: 15078316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the quality of structured environmental management decisions.
    Wilson RS; Arvai JL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Aug; 40(16):4831-7. PubMed ID: 16955874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.