123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15078397)
1. Use of automatic threshold tracking function with non-low polarization leads: risk for algorithm malfunction.
Luria D; Gurevitz O; Bar Lev D; Tkach Y; Eldar M; Glikson M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Apr; 27(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 15078397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of automatic threshold capture on pulse generator longevity.
Chen RH; Chen KP; Wang FZ; Hua W; Zhang S
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Jun; 119(11):925-9. PubMed ID: 16780772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of a ventricular automatic-capture algorithm in a wide clinical setting.
Pecora D; Morandi F; Liccardo M; Pepi P; Orazi S; Caico SI; Scaccia A; Bizeau O; Citerne O; Raciti G; Del Giudice G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Dec; 31(12):1546-53. PubMed ID: 19067806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term experience with AutoCapture-controlled epicardial pacing in children.
Tomaske M; Harpes P; Pretre R; Dodge-Khatami A; Bauersfeld U
Europace; 2007 Aug; 9(8):645-50. PubMed ID: 17630391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of ventricular Autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study.
Boriani G; Rusconi L; Biffi M; Pavia L; Sassara M; Malfitano D; Bongiorni MG; Padeletti L; Filice I; Sanfelici D; Maffei P; Vicentini A; Branzi A
Europace; 2006 Mar; 8(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16627443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute performance evaluation of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm.
Sperzel J; Nowak B; Himmrich E; Zhang G; König A; Willems R; Reister C; Sathaye A; Fröhlig G
Europace; 2006 Jan; 8(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 16627412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrical performance and automatic capture characteristics of a 3.5-mm(2) passive fixation lead during 1-year follow-up.
Lotze U; Fischer S; Höfs T; Liebetrau J; Fettin W; Scheiner J; Lang A;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Aug; 32(8):1050-5. PubMed ID: 19659625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AutoCapture with dual-coil leads of implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Acosta H; Massumi A; Malik R; Ahmad S; Antonio C; Syed ZA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S267-9. PubMed ID: 15683512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term results of endocardial pacing with Autocapture threshold tracking pacemakers in children.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Küçükosmanoğlu O
Europace; 2005 Nov; 7(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 16216759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial of the effect of automated ventricular capture on device longevity and threshold measurement in pacemaker patients.
Koplan BA; Gilligan DM; Nguyen LS; Lau TK; Thackeray LM; Berg KC;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1467-74. PubMed ID: 18950305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ventricular capture management in pediatric pacing: efficacy and safety.
Silvetti MS; De Santis A; Grutter G; Di Ciommo V; Drago F
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):751-6. PubMed ID: 16212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sleep parameters in patients using pacemakers with sleep rate function on.
Greco OT; Bittencourt LR; Vargas RN; Borges MA; Mateos JC; Neto AC; Coelho OD; Silva RS; Mazzo RA; Melatto DM; Tufik S; Gauch PR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Feb; 29(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 16492297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term performance of beat-to-beat automatic ventricular threshold adjustment in infants with congenital atrioventricular block.
Hiippala A; Happonen JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 36(10):1259-64. PubMed ID: 23662601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term performance of screw-in atrial pacing leads: a randomized comparison of J-shaped and straight leads.
Luria D; Bar-Lev D; Gurevitz O; Granit H; Rotstein Z; Eldar M; Glikson M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):898-902. PubMed ID: 16176526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated left ventricular capture management.
Crossley GH; Mead H; Kleckner K; Sheldon T; Davenport L; Harsch MR; Parikh P; Ramza B; Fishel R; Bailey JR;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Oct; 30(10):1190-200. PubMed ID: 17897121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations of the AutoCapture™ Pacing System in patients with cardiac stimulation devices.
Benezet-Mazuecos J; Iglesias JA; Rubio JM; Cortés M; de la Cruz E; de la Vieja JJ; Calle S; Farré J
Europace; 2014 Oct; 16(10):1469-75. PubMed ID: 24789975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of a ventricular automatic capture verification algorithm.
Sperzel J; Kennergren C; Biffi M; Smith M; Knops M; Gill J; Boland J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):933-7. PubMed ID: 16176532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved differentiation of the ventricular evoked response from polarization by modification of the pacemaker impulse.
Provenier F; Germonpré E; De Wagter X
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 23(12):2073-7. PubMed ID: 11202250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Reasons for pacing leads abandonment during pacemaker replacement: a single center experience with 235 cases].
Zhang JT; Chen KP; Hua W; Pu JL; Wang FZ; Zhang S
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 37(6):522-4. PubMed ID: 19927634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
