These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1508052)

  • 21. Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left-and right-handers.
    LAENG B; PETERS M
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Apr; 33(4):421-39. PubMed ID: 7617153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of a concurrent memory task on hemispheric asymmetries in categorization.
    Hass EJ; Whipple JL
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Jan; 4(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 4027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant.
    Kitterle FL; Hellige JB; Christman S
    Brain Cogn; 1992 Nov; 20(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 1449760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing].
    Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical judgments of direction versus coordinate judgments of velocity of motion.
    Christman SD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 12120792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lateralisation of spatial processing and age.
    Meadmore KL; Dror IE; Bucks RS
    Laterality; 2009 Jan; 14(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 19130638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age and visual field differences in computing visual-spatial relations.
    Hoyer WJ; Rybash JM
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 1388853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential visual field-interhemispheric transfer: can it explain sex and handedness differences in lateralization?
    Haude RH; Morrow-Tlucak M; Fox DM; Pickard KB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Oct; 65(2):423-9. PubMed ID: 3696913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information.
    Hellige JB; Taylor AK; Eng TL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):711-22. PubMed ID: 2531206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency.
    Christman S; Kitterle FL; Hellige J
    Brain Cogn; 1991 May; 16(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 1854470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations during an image generation task: evidence from children and adults.
    Reese CJ; Stiles J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 15716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The development of spatial relation representations: evidence from studies of cerebral lateralization.
    Koenig O; Reiss LP; Kosslyn SM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Aug; 50(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 2398329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial processing and hemispheric asymmetry. Contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system.
    Roth EC; Hellige JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jul; 10(4):472-84. PubMed ID: 9712677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinct neural networks underlie encoding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations during active navigation.
    Baumann O; Chan E; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1630-7. PubMed ID: 22300811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Processing from LVF, RVF and BILATERAL presentations: examinations of metacontrol and interhemispheric interaction.
    Hellige JB; Jonsson JE; Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Feb; 7(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 3345268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does right hemisphere superiority sufficiently explain the left visual field advantage in face recognition?
    Harrison MT; Strother L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1205-1220. PubMed ID: 31773512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recognition of CVC Syllables from LVF, RVF, and Central Locations: Hemispheric Differences and Interhemispheric Interaction.
    Hellige JB; Cowin EL; Eng TL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1995; 7(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 23961827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of stimulus features on working memory of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in patients with unilateral brain damage.
    van der Ham IJ; van Wezel RJ; Oleksiak A; van Zandvoort MJ; Frijns CJ; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
    Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):737-45. PubMed ID: 21470602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Asanowicz D; Kruse L; Śmigasiewicz K; Verleger R
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Nov; 118():54-62. PubMed ID: 28797898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of retinal eccentricity on the lateralized processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Horner MD; Freides D
    Int J Neurosci; 1996 Jul; 86(1-2):7-13. PubMed ID: 8828055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.