These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Criteria for clinical efficacy--readout and monitoring of clinical studies. Malling HJ Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M; 2003; (94):119-23; discussion 123-5. PubMed ID: 15119028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials. Potkin SG; Siu CO Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Double-blind, randomized controlled study of bilateral cerebellar stimulation. Kellinghaus C; Loddenkemper T Epilepsia; 2006 Jul; 47(7):1247; author reply 1248-9. PubMed ID: 16886991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders. Gummesson C; Atroshi I; Ekdahl C J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):727-34; discussion 735-7. PubMed ID: 15249101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality of methodology and reporting of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity]. Liu XM; Zhang MM; Du L Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2004 Apr; 26(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 15171560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trials: a summary. Wilhelmsen L; Held P; Wedel H J Intern Med; 2004 Oct; 256(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 15367170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding. Hróbjartsson A; Forfang E; Haahr MT; Als-Nielsen B; Brorson S Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):654-63. PubMed ID: 17440024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experiences with the realisation of innovative study designs using the example of the HOPE-study]. Rangoonwala B Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jul; 130 Suppl 2():S82-5. PubMed ID: 15988674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Behavioral research and the double-blind placebo-controlled methodology: challenges in applying the biomedical standard to behavioral headache research. Rains JC; Penzien DB Headache; 2005 May; 45(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 15953264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology journals. Yao F; Singer M; Rosenfeld RM Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 137(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 17903567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Redefining the randomized controlled trial in the context of acupuncture research. Walji R; Boon H Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2006 May; 12(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 16648085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What we can learn from open-label extensions of randomized clinical trials. Cummings JL Arch Neurol; 2006 Jan; 63(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 16401732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [This blind study was not blind!]. Wettig D MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Nov; 146(48):20. PubMed ID: 15625932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials. Halpern SH; Darani R; Douglas MJ; Wight W; Yee J Int J Obstet Anesth; 2004 Oct; 13(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 15477048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury: a tarnished standard. Miller SM J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2008 Apr; 20(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 18362778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]