These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15081556)

  • 1. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite.
    Tagtekin DA; Yanikoglu FC; Bozkurt FO; Kologlu B; Sur H
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 15081556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials.
    Say EC; Civelek A; Nobecourt A; Ersoy M; Guleryuz C
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 14531611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microhardness evaluation of resin composites polymerized by three different light sources.
    Hubbezoğlu I; Bolayir G; Doğan OM; Doğan A; Ozer A; Bek B
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Nov; 26(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 18203490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites.
    St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials.
    Yanikoğlu N; Duymuş ZY; Yilmaz B
    Dent Mater J; 2009 May; 28(3):344-51. PubMed ID: 19662734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth.
    Zeng J; Sato Y; Ohkubo C; Hosoi T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 16275306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The potential of a resin-composite to be cured to a 4mm depth.
    Fleming GJ; Awan M; Cooper PR; Sloan AJ
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 17669481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microhardness of different thicknesses of resin composite polymerized by conventional photocuring at different distances.
    Aguirar FH; e Oliveria TR; Lima DA; Ambrosano Gm; Lovadino JR
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 18348370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface hardness properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Bayindir YZ; Yildiz M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):42-9. PubMed ID: 15558089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power distribution across the face of different light guides and its effect on composite surface microhardness.
    Vandewalle KS; Roberts HW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):108-17; discussion 118. PubMed ID: 18380841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Ohmiti K; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 20036418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
    Moosavi H; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface hardness of light-activated resin composites cured by two different visible-light sources: an in vitro study.
    Sharkey S; Ray N; Burke F; Ziada H; Hannigan A
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 11444075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depth of cure and surface microhardness of experimental short fiber-reinforced composite.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 18320417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pre-heating on depth of cure and surface hardness of light-polymerized resin composites.
    Muñoz CA; Bond PR; Sy-Muñoz J; Tan D; Peterson J
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 18795516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Knoop hardness of a composite resin polymerized with different curing lights and different modes.
    Yazici AR; Kugel G; Gül G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 17277827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.