BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15081817)

  • 1. Clustering of protein structural fragments reveals modular building block approach of nature.
    Tendulkar AV; Joshi AA; Sohoni MA; Wangikar PP
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 338(3):611-29. PubMed ID: 15081817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An automated classification of the structure of protein loops.
    Oliva B; Bates PA; Querol E; Avilés FX; Sternberg MJ
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Mar; 266(4):814-30. PubMed ID: 9102471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: a database for modeling and prediction.
    Donate LE; Rufino SD; Canard LH; Blundell TL
    Protein Sci; 1996 Dec; 5(12):2600-16. PubMed ID: 8976569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical analysis of secondary structures of beta-peptides.
    Wu YD; Han W; Wang DP; Gao Y; Zhao YL
    Acc Chem Res; 2008 Oct; 41(10):1418-27. PubMed ID: 18828608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A geometric invariant-based framework for the analysis of protein conformational space.
    Tendulkar AV; Sohoni MA; Ogunnaike B; Wangikar PP
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(18):3622-8. PubMed ID: 16096349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incremental Mountain Clustering Method to find building blocks for constructing structures of proteins.
    Lin KL; Lin CT; Pal NR
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2010 Dec; 9(4):278-88. PubMed ID: 21266313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A chirality index for investigating protein secondary structures and their time evolution.
    Pietropaolo A; Muccioli L; Berardi R; Zannoni C
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):667-77. PubMed ID: 17879347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generation of a substructure library for the description and classification of protein secondary structure. I. Overview of the methods and results.
    Prestrelski SJ; Williams AL; Liebman MN
    Proteins; 1992 Dec; 14(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 1438181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new protein folding algorithm based on hydrophobic compactness: Rigid Unconnected Secondary Structure Iterative Assembly (RUSSIA). II: Applications.
    Znamenskiy D; Le Tuan K; Mornon JP; Chomilier J
    Protein Eng; 2003 Dec; 16(12):937-48. PubMed ID: 14983073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.
    Mehler EL; Hassan SA; Kortagere S; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):673-90. PubMed ID: 16729264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beta-hairpin peptidomimetics: design, structures and biological activities.
    Robinson JA
    Acc Chem Res; 2008 Oct; 41(10):1278-88. PubMed ID: 18412373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural prediction of peptides binding to MHC class I molecules.
    Bui HH; Schiewe AJ; von Grafenstein H; Haworth IS
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 16447245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beta-peptidic peptidomimetics.
    Seebach D; Gardiner J
    Acc Chem Res; 2008 Oct; 41(10):1366-75. PubMed ID: 18578513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The world of beta- and gamma-peptides comprised of homologated proteinogenic amino acids and other components.
    Seebach D; Beck AK; Bierbaum DJ
    Chem Biodivers; 2004 Aug; 1(8):1111-239. PubMed ID: 17191902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational modeling of protein mutant stability: analysis and optimization of statistical potentials and structural features reveal insights into prediction model development.
    Parthiban V; Gromiha MM; Abhinandan M; Schomburg D
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Aug; 7():54. PubMed ID: 17705837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining evolutionary and structural information for local protein structure prediction.
    Pei J; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2004 Sep; 56(4):782-94. PubMed ID: 15281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Density-based clustering of small peptide conformations sampled from a molecular dynamics simulation.
    Kim M; Choi SH; Kim J; Choi K; Shin JM; Kang SK; Choi YJ; Jung DH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Nov; 49(11):2528-36. PubMed ID: 19863092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a structural classification of phosphate binding sites in protein-nucleotide complexes: an automated all-against-all structural comparison using geometric matching.
    Brakoulias A; Jackson RM
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 15211509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of peptide structure: how far are we?
    Thomas A; Deshayes S; Decaffmeyer M; Van Eyck MH; Charloteaux B; Brasseur R
    Proteins; 2006 Dec; 65(4):889-97. PubMed ID: 17019719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.