BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15082009)

  • 1. Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach.
    Shuford MD; McDougall EM; Chang SS; LaFleur BJ; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 15082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.
    Dunn MD; Portis AJ; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; Heidorn C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1153-9. PubMed ID: 10992356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma.
    Nelson CP; Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1989-94. PubMed ID: 11956425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison.
    Hemal AK; Kumar A; Kumar R; Wadhwa P; Seth A; Gupta NP
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):862-6. PubMed ID: 17296361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.
    Gill IS; Kavoussi LR; Lane BR; Blute ML; Babineau D; Colombo JR; Frank I; Permpongkosol S; Weight CJ; Kaouk JH; Kattan MW; Novick AC
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 17574056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hand-assisted surgery improves outcomes for laparoscopic nephrectomy.
    Kercher KW; Joels CS; Matthews BD; Lincourt AE; Smith TI; Heniford BT
    Am Surg; 2003 Dec; 69(12):1061-6. PubMed ID: 14700291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The laparoscopic approach to renal tumors outcome of 121 laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy procedures].
    Nadu A; Laufer M; Winkler H; Kleinmann N; Ramon J
    Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):609-12, 679. PubMed ID: 16218528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
    Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with transabdominal radical nephrectomy.
    Mancini GJ; McQuay LA; Klein FA; Mancini ML
    Am Surg; 2002 Feb; 68(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 11842961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer--a report of 43 cases].
    Luo JH; Chen W; Chen LW; Sun XZ; Chen JX; Li XF; Mei H
    Ai Zheng; 2007 Jun; 26(6):629-32. PubMed ID: 17562270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma using a new abdominal wall sealing device.
    Tanaka M; Tokuda N; Koga H; Yokomizo A; Sakamoto N; Naito S
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 10893573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Laparoscopic surgery for renal cancers].
    Vallancien G; Cathala N; Cathelineau X; Rozet F
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2004; 188(1):39-45; discussion 45. PubMed ID: 15368924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of open and laparoscopic nephrectomy in obese and nonobese patients: outcomes stratified by body mass index.
    Feder MT; Patel MB; Melman A; Ghavamian R; Hoenig DM
    J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 18485408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses.
    O'Malley RL; Berger AD; Kanofsky JA; Phillips CK; Stifelman M; Taneja SS
    BJU Int; 2007 Feb; 99(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 17092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.
    Schiff JD; Palese M; Vaughan ED; Sosa RE; Coll D; Del Pizzo JJ
    BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 16153207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases.
    Wille AH; Roigas J; Deger S; Tüllmann M; Türk I; Loening SA
    Eur Urol; 2004 Apr; 45(4):483-8; discussion 488-9. PubMed ID: 15041113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system.
    Simmons MN; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2067-73; discussion 2073. PubMed ID: 17509287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
    Tsujihata M; Nonomura N; Momohara C; Nishimura K; Tsujimura A; Okuyama A
    Urol Int; 2008; 81(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 18931547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Portis AJ; Yan Y; Landman J; Chen C; Barrett PH; Fentie DD; Ono Y; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1257-62. PubMed ID: 11832709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.