121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15082818)
1. Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
Evans HM
J Med Ethics; 2004 Apr; 30(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 15082818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Fair's fair argument" and voluntarism in clinical research: but, is it fair?
Perna MA
J Med Ethics; 2006 Aug; 32(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 16877629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research participation and the right to withdraw.
Edwards SJ
Bioethics; 2005 Apr; 19(2):112-30. PubMed ID: 15943021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples.
Helgesson G; Johnsson L
Med Health Care Philos; 2005; 8(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16283494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ethics of withdrawal: the case of follow-up from first-in-human clinical trials.
Hug K; Johansson M
Regen Med; 2017 Jan; 12(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 27976967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21480062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical considerations for surgeons.
Mali S
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 25569382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
Doyal L
Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i29-33. PubMed ID: 11533435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical genetic research on human subjects.
Harris J
Jurimetrics; 1999; 40():77-91. PubMed ID: 16285118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biobank research and the right to privacy.
Ursin LO
Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(4):267-85. PubMed ID: 18855123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to withdraw from research.
Schaefer GO; Wertheimer A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 21338028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Withdrawing from research: a rethink in the context of research biobanks.
Holm S
Health Care Anal; 2011 Sep; 19(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 21918887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Autonomy and its limits].
Rossel P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2330-3. PubMed ID: 15281568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials.
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):3-12. PubMed ID: 21480063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Need for moral audit in evaluating quality in health care.
Doyal L
Qual Health Care; 1992 Sep; 1(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 10136860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research.
Eriksson S; Helgesson G
Eur J Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 13(9):1071-6. PubMed ID: 15986039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood.
Brauer S
Med Health Care Philos; 2016 Mar; 19(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25837233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Patient participation in clinical training of medical students. Interviews with teachers, patients and students].
Lynöe N; Ekblad S; Elinder G
Lakartidningen; 2008 Sep 17-23; 105(38):2568-71. PubMed ID: 18846859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
