These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15083083)

  • 1. Fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model.
    Jordan DR; Brownstein S; Dorey M; Yuen VH; Gilberg S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Mar; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 15083083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The bioceramic orbital implant: a new generation of porous implants.
    Jordan DR; Mawn LA; Brownstein S; McEachren TM; Gilberg SM; Hill V; Grahovac SZ; Adenis JP
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):347-55. PubMed ID: 11021384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients.
    Tabatabaee Z; Mazloumi M; Rajabi MT; Khalilzadeh O; Kassaee A; Moghimi S; Eftekhar H; Goldberg RA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 20829725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures.
    Jordan DR; Klapper SR; Gilberg SM
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 19(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12544793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary placement of a titanium motility post in a porous polyethylene orbital implant: animal model with quantitative assessment of fibrovascular ingrowth and vascular density.
    Hsu WC; Green JP; Spilker MH; Rubin PA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):370-9. PubMed ID: 11021387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation.
    Wang JK; Liao SL; Lin LL; Kao SC; Tseng HS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 144(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 17499206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: the so-called counterfeit implant.
    Jordan DR; Munro SM; Brownstein S; Gilberg SM; Grahovac SZ
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Jul; 14(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 9700731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanning electron microscopic examination of porous orbital implants.
    Mawn LA; Jordan DR; Gilberg S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 33(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 9660003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brazilian hydroxyapatite implant.
    Jordan DR; Hwang I; McEachren T; Brownstein S; Gilberg S; Grahovac S; Mawn L
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 11021386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of early fibrovascular proliferation according to orbital implant in orbital floor fracture reconstruction.
    Lee H; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1518-23. PubMed ID: 22976649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients.
    Jordan DR; Gilberg S; Bawazeer A
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jan; 20(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 14752315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Molteno M-Sphere.
    Jordan DR; Hwang I; Brownstein S; McEachren T; Gilberg S; Grahovac S; Mawn L
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 11021385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new variety of hydroxyapatite: the Chinese implant.
    Jordan DR; Pelletier CR; Gilberg TS; Brownstein S; Grahovac SZ
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Nov; 15(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 10588251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavior of various orbital implants under axial compression.
    Jordan DR; Ahuja N; Gilberg S; Bouchard R
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 May; 21(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 15942500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Gel and porous polyethylene implants in the rabbit anophthalmic cavity].
    Ferraz LC; Schellini SA; Wludarski SL; Padovani CR
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(3):305-8. PubMed ID: 16936949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of vascularization of Medpor and Medpor-Plus orbital implants: a prospective, randomized study.
    Naik MN; Murthy RK; Honavar SG
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 18030118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants.
    Son J; Kim CS; Yang J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 250(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 22202952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vicryl-mesh wrap for the implantation of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: an animal model.
    Jordan DR; Ells A; Brownstein S; Munro SM; Grahovac SZ; Raymond F; Gilberg SM; Allen LH
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1995 Aug; 30(5):241-6. PubMed ID: 8529157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The survival of freely grafted orbital fat on porous polyethylene orbital implants in the rabbit.
    Kim NJ; Choung HK; Khwarg SI
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 17004626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Rubin PA; Popham JK; Bilyk JR; Shore JW
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7522048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.