These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15083834)

  • 21. The expressivist objection to prenatal diagnosis: can it be laid to rest?
    Holm S
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 18156516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a result of the cultural turn?
    Bromage DI
    Med Humanit; 2006 Jun; 32(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 17036441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disability rights, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics: a cross-cultural view.
    Raz AE
    J Genet Couns; 2005 Jun; 14(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 15959649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Disability community and identity: perceptions of prenatal screening.
    Kaplan D; Saxton M
    Genewatch; 1999 Apr; 12(2):4, 6-8. PubMed ID: 12199297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A choice of evils in prenatal testing.
    Wasserman D
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):295-313. PubMed ID: 15083832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In focus. Has patient autonomy gone to far? Geneticists' views in 36 nations.
    Wertz DC; Fletcher JC; Nippert I; Wolff G; Ayme S
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):W21. PubMed ID: 12778941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can, should, ought, must.
    Trachtman H
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):67-9. PubMed ID: 19998169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mandatory reassignment under the ADA: the circuit split and need for a socio-political understanding of disability.
    Dorsey NA
    Cornell Law Rev; 2009 Jan; 94(2):443-78. PubMed ID: 19288614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Whither the family and family privacy?
    Jones TR; Peterman L
    Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prenatal diagnosis and abortion are not in conflict in Israel.
    Zivotofsky AZ; Jotkowitz A
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):58-60. PubMed ID: 19998165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prenatal testing, reproductive autonomy, and disability interests.
    Scott R
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2005; 14(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 15747484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. State regulatory efforts in protecting a surrogate's bodily autonomy.
    Williams A
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2019; 49(1):205-31. PubMed ID: 30557923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
    State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Center begins reevaluating policy on amniocentesis use for prenatal sex determination.
    Ob Gyn News; 1979 Aug; 14(16):1+. PubMed ID: 11662689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.