These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15083834)

  • 41. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon.
    Hagen JD
    America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What would you do? Reproductive rights.
    Weiss GG
    Med Econ; 2006 Nov; 83(21):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 17154109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dialogue: prenatal diagnosis.
    Singer P
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2000; ():6-7; author reply 7. PubMed ID: 15719508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic disease.
    Boardman FK
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Apr; 107():18-25. PubMed ID: 24602967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again?
    Forde C
    Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An introduction to legal thought: four approaches to law and to the allocation of body parts.
    Calabresi G
    Stanford Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 55(6):2113-51. PubMed ID: 12908477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Working towards a better understanding of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as a legal disability in employment law.
    Sweeney MW
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 21(1):67-98. PubMed ID: 15799535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach.
    Sedillo Lopez A
    Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Eradication of persons suffering from trisomies, although they are sweet people].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Apr; 8(338):918-9. PubMed ID: 22611633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Social and ethical challenges of prenatal diagnosis.
    Beeson D
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2000; ():1-2, 8. PubMed ID: 15782442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Choice in prenatal testing.
    Lippman A
    Genewatch; 1999 Apr; 12(2):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 12199294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The people speak: voters faced important and sometimes complex policy questions on statewide ballots.
    Bowser JD
    State Legis; 2008 Dec; 34(10):19-20. PubMed ID: 19068546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Legal issues in fetomaternal medicine in consideration of ethical quandaries--the German perspective.
    Hecher K; Hackelöer BJ; Bock RW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 15(5):347-9. PubMed ID: 10976472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
    Dailard C
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A firefight over abortion.
    Rosenberg D
    Newsweek; 2003 Nov; 142(18):44. PubMed ID: 16127974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anxiety over abortion.
    Rosenberg D
    Newsweek; 2004 Dec; 144(25):38. PubMed ID: 15631218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.