BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15084820)

  • 1. Mismatch negativity brain response as an index of speech perception recovery in cochlear-implant recipients.
    Lonka E; Kujala T; Lehtokoski A; Johansson R; Rimmanen S; Alho K; Näätänen R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 15084820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users.
    Roman S; Canévet G; Marquis P; Triglia JM; Liégeois-Chauvel C
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mismatch negativity to frequency changes: no evidence from human event-related brain potentials for categorical speech processing of complex tones resembling vowel formant structure.
    Jacobsen T
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 May; 362(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 15158015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Kraus N; Micco AG; Koch DB; McGee T; Carrell T; Sharma A; Wiet RJ; Weingarten CZ
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):118-24. PubMed ID: 8458744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The processing of speech and non-speech sounds in aphasic patients as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Ilvonen T; Kujala T; Kozou H; Kiesiläinen A; Salonen O; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 15288425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity.
    Kozou H; Kujala T; Shtyrov Y; Toppila E; Starck J; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):31-9. PubMed ID: 15574298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mismatch negativity (MMN) brain response to sound frequency changes in adult cochlear implant recipients: a follow-up study.
    Lonka E; Relander-Syrjänen K; Johansson R; Näätänen R; Alho K; Kujala T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 133(8):853-7. PubMed ID: 23768012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing.
    Tampas JW; Harkrider AW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1147-64. PubMed ID: 16411803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience.
    Kirmse U; Ylinen S; Tervaniemi M; Vainio M; Schröger E; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 18160160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination of stress in speech and music: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Peter V; McArthur G; Thompson WF
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Dec; 49(12):1590-600. PubMed ID: 23066846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects.
    Wable J; van den Abbeele T; Gallégo S; Frachet B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 10727926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children with dyslexia reveal abnormal native language representations: evidence from a study of mismatch negativity.
    Bruder J; Leppänen PH; Bartling J; Csépe V; Démonet JF; Schulte-Körne G
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1107-18. PubMed ID: 21332488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recovery from forward masking in elderly cochlear implant users.
    Lee ER; Friedland DR; Runge CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 22410729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
    Zheng Y; Soli SD; Tao Y; Xu K; Meng Z; Li G; Wang K; Zheng H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Nov; 75(11):1418-26. PubMed ID: 21893351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background.
    Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Change and novelty detection in speech and non-speech sound streams.
    Sorokin A; Alku P; Kujala T
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():77-90. PubMed ID: 20188710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.