These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15085702)

  • 1. Physicians not qualified as experts on nursing care. Case on point: Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 2004 WL 228956 N.E.2d--IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Mar; 44(10):4. PubMed ID: 15085702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postsurgical patient falls out of bed: did RIL apply? Case on point: Giegoldt v. Condell Medical Center, 2002 WL 538017 N.E.2d-IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Apr; 42(11):4. PubMed ID: 12040614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in vitals, etc. not reported: "window exit death". Case in point: Busta v. Columbus Hosp. Corp. 916P. 2d 122--MT (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jul; 37(2):2. PubMed ID: 8850779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OH: aged agitated pt. with dementia falls: expert testimony-no deviation from standards.
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Jan; 39(8):3. PubMed ID: 10086009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RN's expert testimony not 'required'--not 'barred'. Case on point: Davis v. Montgomery Cnty. Mem. Hosp., No. 6-086/05 (Iowa app. 07/12/2006)-IA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):2. PubMed ID: 16937912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TN: nurse assists in ambulating--patient falls: simple negligence or medical malpractice?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Nov; 41(6):3. PubMed ID: 11995005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failure to recall & chart pt.'s fall: 'falsus in uno' test. Case on point: Green v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc., 2002 WL 371808 NE.2d. -DE.
    Tammelleo AD
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Mar; 42(10):2. PubMed ID: 11980417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remembering the long, hot afternoon I gave a deposition.
    Lagasse FE
    Nursing; 1990 Jul; 20(7):46. PubMed ID: 2366969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LA: Disoriented Alzheimer patient falls from bed: failure to have expert witness fatal to Pt.'s case.
    Tammelleo AD
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Dec; 43(7):3. PubMed ID: 12599748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurse-expert fails to 'go to bat' in testifying for plaintiffs. Case on point: Ross v. Redding Medical Center, 2003 WL 21246105-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Jun; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 12886709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court erred in failure to allow dr.'s expert opinion.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Apr; 47(11):2. PubMed ID: 17491278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. OH: did fracture cause fall or vice versa?: Lack of expert testimony as to proximate cause.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jul; 42(2):3. PubMed ID: 11995313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court barred Dr.'s testimony v. advanced practice RN. Case on point: Smith v. Pavlovich, 5-08-0256 (9/10/2009)-IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Oct; 50(5):4. PubMed ID: 19928312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurse-expert testifies as to standards for 'sticking' pt. Case on point: Mengelson v. Ingalls Health Ventures, 2001 WL 540365 N.E.2d-IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):2. PubMed ID: 11995398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurses fail to keep physicians informed of multiple seizures. Case in point: Glassman v. St. Joseph Hospital 631 N.E. 2d 1186--IL (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):4. PubMed ID: 8047646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.