162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15085748)
1. Impact of liquid-based gynecologic cytology on an HIV-positive population.
Swierczynski SL; Lewis-Chambers S; Anderson JR; Keller JM; Hinkle DA; Ali SZ
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 15085748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of HIV infection on atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duerr A; Paramsothy P; Jamieson DJ; Heilig CM; Klein RS; Cu-Uvin S; Schuman P; Anderson JR;
Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 42(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16477565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology.
Chhieng DC; Talley LI; Roberson J; Gatscha RM; Jhala NC; Elgert PA
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 96(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 11954023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: is it worthwhile to qualify them further?
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sehgal A; Singh V; Khan IU; Mitra AB
Indian J Cancer; 2003; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 14716128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of precancer and follow-up management strategies for women with human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Safaeian M; Solomon D; Wacholder S; Schiffman M; Castle P
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17540804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional and liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison study with clinical and histologic follow-up.
Baker JJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 12203869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of extensive hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal smears.
Williamson BA; DeFrias D; Gunn R; Tarjan G; Nayar R
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(5):749-52. PubMed ID: 14526673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence and risk factors of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix among HIV-infected women - a long-term follow-up study in a low-prevalence population.
Lehtovirta P; Finne P; Nieminen P; Skogberg K; Savonius H; Paavonen J; Heikinheimo O
Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):831-4. PubMed ID: 17212861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
Roche DH; Spicer N
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
