These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1508618)

  • 1. Random-zero sphygmomanometer, Rose's tape, and the accuracy of the blood pressure measurements in children.
    Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Uhari M
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Aug; 32(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 1508618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A meta-analytical approach to the pooling of blood pressure values in children.
    Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Uhari M
    Arctic Med Res; 1996 Jul; 55(3):107-17. PubMed ID: 8885432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer versus the standard sphygmomanometer: an investigation of mechanisms.
    Kinirons MT; Maskrey VL; Lawson M; Swift CG; Jackson SH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Jul; 9(7):571-3. PubMed ID: 7562887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of end-digit preference in blood pressure records of hospitalized chinese patients and analysis of risk factors.
    Jie G; Jian W; Qiaowen H; Shanzhu Z
    Postgrad Med; 2012 Mar; 124(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 22437215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the measurement of children's blood pressure in an epidemiological multicentre study.
    Uhari M
    Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl; 1985; 318():79-88. PubMed ID: 3867233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
    Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulse sounds and measurement of diastolic blood pressure in children.
    Uhari M; Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Pokka T
    Lancet; 1991 Jul; 338(8760):159-61. PubMed ID: 1677074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults.
    Ilman N; Altunkan S; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17303987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
    Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
    Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitors with standard zero and random zero sphygmomanometers].
    Tislér A; Barna I; Châtel R
    Orv Hetil; 1994 Jun; 135(26):1415-9. PubMed ID: 8028897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.