These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1508621)

  • 1. Adaptation to auditory motion in the horizontal plane: effect of prior exposure to motion on motion detectability.
    Grantham DW
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Aug; 52(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 1508621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity.
    Chandler DW; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1624-36. PubMed ID: 1564199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field.
    Grantham DW
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Feb; 45(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 2928074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum audible movement angles as a function of sound source trajectory.
    Saberi K; Perrott DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2639-44. PubMed ID: 2283437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.
    Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1939-49. PubMed ID: 3722604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic minimum audible angle: binaural spatial acuity with moving sound sources.
    Perrott DR; Musicant AD
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 7186505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The auditory motion aftereffect: its tuning and specificity in the spatial and frequency domains.
    Dong CJ; Swindale NV; Zakarauskas P; Hayward V; Cynader MS
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):1099-111. PubMed ID: 10997052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual motion influences the contingent auditory motion aftereffect.
    Vroomen J; de Gelder B
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Jul; 14(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 12807410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth.
    Perrott DR; Saberi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1728-31. PubMed ID: 2341677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum audible movement angle: marking the end points of the path traveled by a moving sound source.
    Perrott DR; Marlborough K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1773-5. PubMed ID: 2708691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The auditory aftereffects of radial sound source motion with different velocities].
    Andreeva IG; Malinina ES
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2011; 37(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 21469357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory apparent motion in the free field: the effects of stimulus duration and separation.
    Strybel TZ; Witty AM; Perrott DR
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Aug; 52(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 1508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum auditory movement angle: binaural localization of moving sound sources.
    Perrott DR; Musicant AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 Dec; 62(6):1463-6. PubMed ID: 591679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical neuroimaging during auditory motion aftereffects reveals that auditory motion processing is motion sensitive but not direction selective.
    Magezi DA; Buetler KA; Chouiter L; Annoni JM; Spierer L
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 109(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 23076114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of the acoustic context on vertical sound localization in the median plane.
    Getzmann S
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1045-57. PubMed ID: 14674632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimum audible movement angle as a function of the azimuth and elevation of the source.
    Strybel TZ; Manligas CL; Perrott DR
    Hum Factors; 1992 Jun; 34(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 1634240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of bilateral and unilateral ablation of auditory cortex in cats on the unconditioned head orienting response to acoustic stimuli.
    Beitel RE; Kaas JH
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):351-69. PubMed ID: 8360719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a sound source moving in a vertical plane on postural responses in humans.
    Agaeva MY; Al'tman YA; Kirillova IY
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2006 Sep; 36(7):773-80. PubMed ID: 16841160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity to simulated directional sound motion in the rat primary auditory cortex.
    Doan DE; Saunders JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 81(5):2075-87. PubMed ID: 10322049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners.
    Makous JC; Middlebrooks JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2188-200. PubMed ID: 2348023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.