BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15086306)

  • 1. Disparity increment thresholds for gratings.
    Farell B; Li S; McKee SP
    J Vis; 2004 Mar; 4(3):156-68. PubMed ID: 15086306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coarse scales, fine scales, and their interactions in stereo vision.
    Farell B; Li S; McKee SP
    J Vis; 2004 Jun; 4(6):488-99. PubMed ID: 15330716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detectability of sine- versus square-wave disparity gratings: A challenge for current models of depth perception.
    Allenmark F; Read JC
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):17. PubMed ID: 20884592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of age and optical blur on real depth stereoacuity.
    Costa MF; Moreira SM; Hamer RD; Ventura DF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 20883352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty.
    Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2321-8. PubMed ID: 18682260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic depth perception in peripheral field and global processing of horizontal disparity gradient pattern.
    Devisme C; Drobe B; Monot A; Droulez J
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 18249435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye movements facilitate stereo-slant discrimination when horizontal disparity is noisy.
    Berends EM; Zhang ZL; Schor CM
    J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):780-94. PubMed ID: 14765961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression.
    Watanabe K; Paik Y; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3065-71. PubMed ID: 15474579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading a population code: a multi-scale neural model for representing binocular disparity.
    Tsai JJ; Victor JD
    Vision Res; 2003 Feb; 43(4):445-66. PubMed ID: 12536001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing the horizontal-vertical stereo anisotropy with the critical-band masking paradigm.
    Serrano-Pedraza I; Brash C; Read JC
    J Vis; 2013 Sep; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 24071587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereoacuity thresholds in the presence of a reference surface.
    Andrews TJ; Glennerster A; Parker AJ
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(23):3051-61. PubMed ID: 11704242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orientation-specific computation in stereoscopic vision.
    Farell B
    J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 26(36):9098-106. PubMed ID: 16957066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coarse-fine dichotomies in human stereopsis.
    Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2653-65. PubMed ID: 19520102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects and ocular prevalence.
    Heinrich SP; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1321-8. PubMed ID: 15733964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A normative dataset on human global stereopsis using the quick Disparity Sensitivity Function (qDSF).
    Reynaud A; Gao Y; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):97-103. PubMed ID: 26028556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels.
    Badcock DR; Schor CM
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1985 Jul; 2(7):1211-6. PubMed ID: 4020518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency.
    Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception.
    Prince SJ; Eagle RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Jul; 266(1426):1361-5. PubMed ID: 10445290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.