These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15086988)
1. Chlamydia testing in contraceptive clinics: who, where, how and why? Bacon L J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2004 Apr; 30(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 15086988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Several women students were diagnosed with chlamydial infections last term so we are keen to promote awareness of this condition. Kilcoin A Nurs Times; 2001 Sep 20-26; 97(38):39. PubMed ID: 11935856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Removing the stigma. Kilcoin A Nurs Times; 2001 Nov 15-21; 97(46):60-1. PubMed ID: 11966059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the family planning clinical setting across New South Wales. Bateson DJ; Weisberg E; Lota H Sex Health; 2006 Mar; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 16607970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunistic screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection and partner follow-up in family planning clinics in three Scottish cities. Noone A; Spiers A; Allardice G; Carr S; Flett G; Brown A; Twaddle S J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2004 Apr; 30(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 15086989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction in unnecessary Chlamydia screening among older women at title X-funded family planning sites following a structural intervention--San Francisco, 2009. Bernstein KT; Marcus JL; Snell A; Liska S; Rauch L; Philip SS Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21139515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The silent epidemic of Chlamydia trachomatis: the urgent need for detection and treatment in women. Walsh C; Anderson LA; Irwin K J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 May; 9(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 10868604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re-audit of referral compliance of chlamydia-positive women from a family planning clinic. Siddiqui F; Kirkman RJ; Chandiok S J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2004 Apr; 30(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 15086990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A paradox: overscreening of older women for Chlamydia while too few younger women are being tested. Berman SM; Satterwhite CL Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 21173722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the population diagnosed with chlamydia in primary care with that diagnosed in sexual health clinics: implications for a national screening programme. Cassell JA; Mercer CH; Fenton KA; Copas AJ; Erens B; Wellings K; Johnson AM Public Health; 2006 Oct; 120(10):984-8. PubMed ID: 16949114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genital chlamydial disease in an urban, primarily Hispanic, family planning clinic. Neu NM; Grumet S; Saiman L; McMahon DJ; Westhoff C Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Jul; 25(6):317-21. PubMed ID: 9662767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A collaborative approach to management of chlamydial infection among teenagers seeking contraceptive care in a community setting. James NJ; Hughes S; Ahmed-Jushuf I; Slack RC Sex Transm Infect; 1999 Jun; 75(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 10448392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disentangling screening and diagnostic Chlamydia test positivity among females testing at title x-funded and adolescent health clinics, san francisco 2009. Stephens SC; Snell A; Liska S; Rauch L; Philip SS; Bernstein KT Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jul; 38(7):630-3. PubMed ID: 21301386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in 6810 young women attending family planning clinics. Ramstedt K; Forssman L; Giesecke J; Granath F Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1571382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chlamydia trachomatis testing in the second British national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles: respondent uptake and treatment outcomes. McCadden A; Fenton KA; McManus S; Mercer CH; Erens B; Carder C; Ridgway G; Macdowall W; Nanchahal K; Byron CL; Copas A; Wellings K; Johnson AM Sex Transm Dis; 2005 Jun; 32(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 15912087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-benefit analysis of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending Colorado family planning clinics. Humphreys JT; Henneberry JF; Rickard RS; Beebe JL Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 1561588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlamydia screening project starts in Nova Gorica, Slovenia. Frelih T Euro Surveill; 2005 Jun; 10(6):E050609.3. PubMed ID: 16783097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contraceptive Method Use and Chlamydia Positivity Among California Family Planning Clients: The Case for New Multipurpose Prevention Technologies. Hunter LA; Nelson L; Chow JM; Holt BY; Bauer HM J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jun; 27(6):768-774. PubMed ID: 29377757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A tale of two sexually transmitted diseases. Prevalences and predictors of chlamydia and gonorrhea in women attending Colorado family planning clinics. Gershman KA; Barrow JC Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 8946633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opportunities for chlamydia control in the era of healthcare reform: lessons from two decades of innovative family planning care. Satterwhite CL; Chow JM; Bernstein KT; Guerry SL; Nakatsukasa-Ono W; Bauer HM Womens Health (Lond); 2013 Jan; 9(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 23241153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]