341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15087571)
1. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability using ordinal and visual analogue scaling and their relation with nasalance scores.
Bettens K; Bruneel L; Maryn Y; De Bodt M; Luyten A; Van Lierde KM
J Commun Disord; 2018; 76():11-20. PubMed ID: 30071470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
Sweeney T; Sell D
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 and perceptual judgments of hypernasality.
Bettens K; De Bodt M; Maryn Y; Luyten A; Wuyts FL; Van Lierde KM
J Commun Disord; 2016; 62():67-81. PubMed ID: 27310727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children.
Park M; Baek WS; Lee E; Koh KS; Kim BK; Baek R
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Feb; 67(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 24211114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual assessment of resonance and velopharyngeal function.
Kummer AW
Semin Speech Lang; 2011 May; 32(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 21948642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice low tone to high tone ratio, nasalance, and nasality ratings in connected speech of native Mandarin speakers: a pilot study.
Tsai YJ; Wang CP; Lee GS
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Jul; 49(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 21740178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production.
Garcia AF; Marino VC; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Guerra TA; Lauris JR; Dutka Jde C
Codas; 2014; 26(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 25388073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting speech in patients with isolated cleft palate. A methodic, clinical and instrumental study.
Haapanen ML
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl; 1992; 26():1-61. PubMed ID: 1486205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of audible nasal emission in speakers with cleft palate: a comparative study of listener judgments.
Baylis AL; Munson B; Moller KT
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 20572776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech outcome regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish children a year after pharyngeal flap surgery. A pilot study.
Van Lierde KM; Bonte K; Baudonck N; Van Cauwenberge P; De Leenheer EM
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 18698142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
Bressmann T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normative Nasalance Scores for Brazilian Portuguese Using New Speech Stimuli.
Marino VC; Dutka Jde C; de Boer G; Cardoso VM; Ramos RG; Bressmann T
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(5):238-44. PubMed ID: 26844554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children.
Watterson T; Hinton J; McFarlane S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8849861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of perceptual evaluation for resonance disorders to nasalance scores in children with cleft palate.
Prathanee B; Pumnum T; Seepuaham C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Nov; 95 Suppl 11():S100-5. PubMed ID: 23961628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
