These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15088734)

  • 1. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations.
    LoPresti JT; David S; Calamia JR
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 9002814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of ceramic inserts after cementation.
    Ozcan M; Pfeiffer P; Nergiz I
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 11931135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
    Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement.
    Ibarra G; Johnson GH; Geurtsen W; Vargas MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 16499961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Resch U
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 10530275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ
    Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems.
    Sertgöz A; Gemalmaz D; Alkumru H; Yoruç B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Jun; 3(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8601157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.