BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15089028)

  • 1. Power analysis.
    Allison SC
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Mar; 34(3):150-1; author reply 151-2. PubMed ID: 15089028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of statistical power for confidence intervals.
    Liu XS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 22026811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the Fieller-Hinkley distribution of the ratio of random variables in testing for noninferiority.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 17365219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels.
    Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New tests for null hypothesis of non unity ratio of proportions.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 17365220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive statistical analysis following sample size modification based on interim review of effect size.
    Hung HM; Cui L; Wang SJ; Lawrence J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):693-706. PubMed ID: 16022173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative results and the limitations of power.
    Penington A
    ANZ J Surg; 2008; 78(1-2):99-102. PubMed ID: 18199219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corrected profile likelihood confidence interval for binomial paired incomplete data.
    Pradhan V; Menon S; Das U
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 23296487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation for simulation-based multiple-testing procedures.
    Bang H; Jung SH; George SL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):957-67. PubMed ID: 16279354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basic philosophy of statistical tests, confidence intervals and sample size determination.
    Indrayan A; Satyanarayana L
    Indian Pediatr; 2000 Jul; 37(7):739-51. PubMed ID: 10906806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size planning for longitudinal models: accuracy in parameter estimation for polynomial change parameters.
    Kelley K; Rausch JR
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 21744968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An introduction to sample size and power.
    Bernstein BA
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2008 Dec; 29(6):516-22. PubMed ID: 19077847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of adaptive designs: efficiency evaluation.
    Menon S; Chang M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):641-61. PubMed ID: 22651106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2012 Dec; 39(12):991-4. PubMed ID: 23919813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for principal component loadings in the presence of missing data: a multiple-imputation approach.
    van Ginkel JR; Kiers HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):498-515. PubMed ID: 21973098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Dec; 36(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 23209006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.