These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Experimental investigation of criteria for continuous variable entanglement. Bowen WP; Schnabel R; Lam PK; Ralph TC Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Jan; 90(4):043601. PubMed ID: 12570421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demonstration of a controlled-phase gate for continuous-variable one-way quantum computation. Ukai R; Yokoyama S; Yoshikawa J; van Loock P; Furusawa A Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Dec; 107(25):250501. PubMed ID: 22243056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Entangling different degrees of freedom by quadrature squeezing cylindrically polarized modes. Gabriel C; Aiello A; Zhong W; Euser TG; Joly NY; Banzer P; Förtsch M; Elser D; Andersen UL; Marquardt Ch; Russell PS; Leuchs G Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Feb; 106(6):060502. PubMed ID: 21405449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gaussian entanglement distribution with gigahertz bandwidth. Ast S; Ast M; Mehmet M; Schnabel R Opt Lett; 2016 Nov; 41(21):5094-5097. PubMed ID: 27805703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental preparation of quadripartite cluster and Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entangled states for continuous variables. Su X; Tan A; Jia X; Zhang J; Xie C; Peng K Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Feb; 98(7):070502. PubMed ID: 17359004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental characterization of continuous-variable orbital angular momentum entanglement using Stokes-operator basis. Cai C; Ma L; Li J; Guo H; Liu K; Sun H; Gao J Opt Express; 2018 Mar; 26(5):5724-5732. PubMed ID: 29529774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Demonstration of a stable atom-photon entanglement source for quantum repeaters. Chen S; Chen YA; Zhao B; Yuan ZS; Schmiedmayer J; Pan JW Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Nov; 99(18):180505. PubMed ID: 17995391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cavity-enhanced and long-lived optical memories for two orthogonal polarizations in cold atoms. Wen Y; Zhou P; Xu Z; Yuan L; Wang M; Wang S; Chen L; Wang H Opt Express; 2020 Jan; 28(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 32118964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental realization of spatially separated entanglement with continuous variables using laser pulse trains. Zhang Y; Okubo R; Hirano M; Eto Y; Hirano T Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13029. PubMed ID: 26278478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generating controllable atom-light entanglement with a Raman atom laser system. Haine SA; Olsen MK; Hope JJ Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Apr; 96(13):133601. PubMed ID: 16711985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atomic motion in magneto-optical double-well potentials: a testing ground for quantum chaos. Ghose S; Alsing PM; Deutsch IH Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2001 Nov; 64(5 Pt 2):056119. PubMed ID: 11736026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Entangling the spatial properties of laser beams. Wagner K; Janousek J; Delaubert V; Zou H; Harb C; Treps N; Morizur JF; Lam PK; Bachor HA Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):541-3. PubMed ID: 18653887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Entanglement and entropy engineering of atomic two-qubit States. Clark SG; Parkins AS Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Jan; 90(4):047905. PubMed ID: 12570464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]