These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15089838)
1. Veda-scope: More comfortable than the bivalve speculum and cytologically equivalent. Longmore PG Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 44(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 15089838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised controlled trial comparing a dilating vaginal speculum with a conventional bivalve speculum. Thomas A; Weisberg E; Lieberman D; Fraser IS Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 11787909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speculum 'self-insertion': a pilot study. Wright D; Fenwick J; Stephenson P; Monterosso L J Clin Nurs; 2005 Oct; 14(9):1098-111. PubMed ID: 16164528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening of cervical neoplasia by using pap smear with speculoscopy compared with pap smear alone. Boonlikit S; Supakarapongkul W; Preuksaritanond N; Vipupinyo C; Tuipae S; Mangclaviras S; Karnplumjid S; Chantarawiroj P J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 15962661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments. Toffler WL; Pluedeman CK; Sinclair AE; Ireland KM; Byrne BJ Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8349063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear. Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears. Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush. Lo L; Jordan J Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Papanicolaou smears: to swab or not to swab. Hans N; Cave AJ; Szafran O; Johnson G; Glass A; Spooner GR; Klemka PJ; Schipper S Can Fam Physician; 2007 Aug; 53(8):1328-9. PubMed ID: 17872849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer. Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa. Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal maturation index self-sample collection in mid-life women: acceptability and correlation with physician-collected samples. Hess R; Austin RM; Dillon S; Chang CC; Ness RB Menopause; 2008; 15(4 Pt 1):726-9. PubMed ID: 18427354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HPV testing versus repeat Pap testing for the management of a minor abnormal Pap smear: evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choice. McCaffery KJ; Irwig L; Chan SF; Macaskill P; Barratt A; Lewicka M; Clarke J; Weisberg E Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):473-9, 481. PubMed ID: 18757164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal speculum lubrication and its effects on cervical cytology and microbiology. Griffith WF; Stuart GS; Gluck KL; Heartwell SF Contraception; 2005 Jul; 72(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 15964294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of liquid-based gel application during speculum examination on satisfactory level of smear examination. Köşüş A; Köşüş N; Duran M; Haltaş H; Hızlı D; Kafalı H Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1599-602. PubMed ID: 22212650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature]. Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study. Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus in a community setting: feasibility in Hispanic women. De Alba I; Anton-Culver H; Hubbell FA; Ziogas A; Hess JR; Bracho A; Arias C; Manetta A Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(8):2163-8. PubMed ID: 18708409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An open-label randomized trial to determine the most effective regimen of vaginal estrogen to reduce the prevalence of atrophic changes reported in postmenopausal cervical smears. Bateson DJ; Weisberg E Menopause; 2009; 16(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 19407678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]