These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1509041)

  • 1. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.
    Bird RE; Wallace TW; Yankaskas BC
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):613-7. PubMed ID: 1509041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A preliminary report on the role of spatial frequency analysis in the perception of breast cancers missed at mammography screening.
    Mello-Thoms C; Chapman B
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):894-908. PubMed ID: 15288040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
    Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missed Breast Cancer: What Can We Learn?
    Wadhwa A; Sullivan JR; Gonyo MB
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(6):402-419. PubMed ID: 27079634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancers invisible on mammography.
    Foxcroft LM; Evans EB; Joshua HK; Hirst C
    Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Mar; 70(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 10765896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists.
    Goergen SK; Evans J; Cohen GP; MacMillan JH
    Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 9205234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancers in women 35 years of age and younger: mammographic findings.
    Shaw de Paredes E; Marsteller LP; Eden BV
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 2399309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Role of ultrasonics in the diagnosis of subclinical carcinoma of the breast].
    Giuseppetti GM; Rizzatto G; Gozzi G; Ercolani P
    Radiol Med; 1989 Oct; 78(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 2687963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evaluation of false negative mammography from malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Wang J; Shih TT; Hsu JC; Li YW
    Clin Imaging; 2000; 24(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 11124482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between missed breast cancers on mammography in a test-set based assessment scheme and real-life performance in a National Breast Screening Programme.
    Chen Y; James JJ; Michalopoulou E; Darker IT; Jenkins J
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109881. PubMed ID: 34352657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Retrospectively detectable carcinomas: review of the literature].
    Boyer B; Hauret L; Bellaiche R; Gräf C; Bourcier B; Fichet G
    J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 85(12 Pt 2):2071-8. PubMed ID: 15692422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner.
    Chang CH; Nesbit DE; Fisher DR; Fritz SL; Dwyer SJ; Templeton AW; Lin F; Jewell WR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Mar; 138(3):553-8. PubMed ID: 6978009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer missed by mammography.
    Martin JE; Moskowitz M; Milbrath JR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 May; 132(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 107737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Geographical and seasonal barriers to mammography services and breast cancer stage at diagnosis.
    Onitilo AA; Liang H; Stankowski RV; Engel JM; Broton M; Doi SA; Miskowiak DA
    Rural Remote Health; 2014; 14(3):2738. PubMed ID: 25018129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
    Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
    Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.