192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1509091)
1. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Georgia Supreme Court affirmed 'gross negligence' standard Case on point: Gliemmo v. Cousineau, SO9A1807 (3/15/2010) So.2d-GA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):4. PubMed ID: 20499621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal case briefs for nurses. AL.: nursing protocols excluded in death case: reversible error issue; AL.: E.R. nurse toe tags wrong bodies: can nurse rely on police identification?
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):3. PubMed ID: 1594771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. E.R. nurse fails to alert Dr.: lupus patient dies. Case in point: Major v. North Valley Hospital (759 P. 2d 153--MT (1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Oct; 29(5):4. PubMed ID: 3200996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Doctor "did not know what he was doing": death results. Case in point: Robinson v. Kaiser Foundation Hosps. (269 Cal. Rptr. 468--CA 1990).
Tamelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Aug; 31(3):2. PubMed ID: 2217813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Death after E.R. treatment: proximate cause issue. Case in point: Godeaux v. Rayne Branch Hosp. (606 So. 2d 948--LA [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Feb; 33(9):4. PubMed ID: 8484002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Expert attributes cause of child's death to nursing negligence.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 May; 49(12):1. PubMed ID: 20302144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ER nurse leaves intact fetus in patient's clothing. Case on point: Roddy v. Tanner Medical Center, 585 S.E.2d 175-GA (2003).
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Oct; 44(5):4. PubMed ID: 14621518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Does "monitor the patients" mean constantly?: $1.5 million verdict. Case in point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jan; 37(8):2. PubMed ID: 9070774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
