53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1509153)
1. [A protocol for evaluating screen-film systems].
Benini L; Gozzi G; Bellis G; De Guarrini F; Dalla Palma L
Radiol Med; 1992; 84(1-2):92-7. PubMed ID: 1509153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Quality assurance in radiology: quality control of radiographic cassettes].
Ferretti PP; Sarti M; Messori P; Boni L; Seligardi P; Tassoni D; Cattini V; Piccagli V; Barani A; Bianchi C; Borasi G; Troiso A; Soliani Raschini C
Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 8975314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The suitability of the surface-dose product for the evaluation of different film-screen systems in relation to their sensitivity in practice].
Weidenmaier W; Merz T; Schumacher KA
Rontgenpraxis; 1991 Jun; 44(6):185-8. PubMed ID: 1871666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
Hoeschen D
Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement].
Borasi G; Berardi P; Ferretti PP; Piccagli V
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 2236696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity.
Borasi G; Bregant P; Crespi A; De Denaro M; Ferretti PP; De Guarrini F; Levrero F; Mozzo P; Novario R; Pedroli G
Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 8327771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Sensitivity S of film-screen systems and mode of operation of different automatic exposure systems in general practice conditions. II: Automatic exposure systems].
Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Nov; 7(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 9467029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
Gorelik FG
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The parameters of image quality of a novel ultra high resolution film-screen system].
Beutel J; Mickewich DJ; Issler SL; Shaw R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8136386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Practical testing of film-screen systems according to DIN 6868, Section 50].
Knedel H; Weberling R; Hagemann G
Rontgenpraxis; 1990 Jun; 43(6):218-9. PubMed ID: 2360099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
Maurer HJ; Goos F
Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
