231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15093926)
1. Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neck.
Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Le QT; Findley D; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 15093926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study on surface dose generated in prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN; Barnett RB
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 17134664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Kry SF; Salehpour M; Followill DS; Stovall M; Kuban DA; White RA; Rosen II
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1204-16. PubMed ID: 15990026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical implementation of tangential field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using sliding window technique and dosimetric comparison with 3D conformal therapy (3DCRT) in breast cancer.
Selvaraj RN; Beriwal S; Pourarian RJ; Lalonde RJ; Chen A; Mehta K; Brunner G; Wagner KA; Yue NJ; Huq SM; Heron DE
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 17980832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is intensity-modulated radiotherapy better than conventional radiation treatment and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for mediastinal masses in patients with Hodgkin's disease, and is there a role for beam orientation optimization and dose constraints assigned to virtual volumes?
Girinsky T; Pichenot C; Beaudre A; Ghalibafian M; Lefkopoulos D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 16169675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
