These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15094446)
1. The value of a completely automatic ECG gated blood pool SPECT processing method for the estimation of global systolic left ventricular function. Daou D; Coaguila C; Benada A; Razzouk M; Haidar M; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Slama M; Guludec DL Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Mar; 25(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 15094446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocardiographically gated blood-pool SPECT and left ventricular function: comparative value of 3 methods for ejection fraction and volume estimation. Daou D; Harel F; Helal BO; Fourme T; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Mariano-Goulart D; Faraggi M; Slama M; Le Guludec D J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):1043-9. PubMed ID: 11438625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gated blood-pool SPECT automated versus manual left ventricular function calculations. Slart RH; Poot L; Piers DA; van Veldhuisen DJ; Nichols K; Jager PL Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Jan; 25(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 15061268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative value of ECG-gated blood pool SPET and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET in the assessment of global systolic left ventricular function. Daou D; Vilain D; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Coaguila C; Benada A; Idy-Peretti I; Slama M; Le Guludec D Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jun; 30(6):859-67. PubMed ID: 12677300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gated blood pool SPECT for measurement of left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of 8 and 16 frame gated blood pool SPECT. Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Kim YS; Kim YK Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2005; 21(2-3):261-6. PubMed ID: 16015439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes with quantitative gated SPECT: influence of algorithm, pixel size and reconstruction parameters in small and normal-sized hearts. Hambye AS; Vervaet A; Dobbeleir A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1606-13. PubMed ID: 15290114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of gated blood pool SPECT and multi-detector row computed tomography for measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with atypical chest pain: validation with radionuclide ventriculography. Kim IJ; Choo KS; Lee JS; Kim SJ; Kim JH; Kim YK; Kim DS; Cho HJ Cardiology; 2007; 107(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16741353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of 4D-MSPECT and QGS for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPET: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Lipke CS; Kühl HP; Nowak B; Kaiser HJ; Reinartz P; Koch KC; Buell U; Schaefer WM Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Apr; 31(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 14722679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of OSEM and depth-dependent resolution recovery algorithms for the evaluation of global left ventricular function in 201Tl gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Daou D; Pointurier I; Coaguila C; Vilain D; Benada AW; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Slama M; Le Guludec D J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 12571203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New hybrid count- and geometry-based method for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from ECG-gated SPECT: methodology and validation. Liu YH; Sinusas AJ; Khaimov D; Gebuza BI; Wackers FJ J Nucl Cardiol; 2005; 12(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15682366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical validation of the gated blood pool SPECT QBS processing software in congestive heart failure patients: correlation with MUGA, first-pass RNV and 2D-echocardiography. Hacker M; Hoyer X; Kupzyk S; La Fougere C; Kois J; Stempfle HU; Tiling R; Hahn K; Störk S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006; 22(3-4):407-16. PubMed ID: 16328851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic quantification of right ventricular function with gated blood pool SPECT. Daou D; Van Kriekinge SD; Coaguila C; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Sitbon O; Parent F; Slama M; Le Guludec D; Simonneau G J Nucl Cardiol; 2004; 11(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 15173776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of quantitative blood pool SPECT imaging with 180 degrees and 360 degrees acquisition orbits on accuracy of cardiac function. Adachi I; Umeda T; Shimomura H; Suwa M; Komori T; Ogura Y; Utsunomiya K; Kitaura Y; Narabayashi I J Nucl Cardiol; 2005; 12(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 15812373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of equilibrium electrocardiography-gated SPECT radionuclide angiography versus planar radionuclide angiography for the quantification of global left ventricular function. Daou D; Coaguila C; Benada A J Nucl Cardiol; 2006; 13(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 16580960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood-pool SPECT: comparison with planar gated blood-pool imaging and assessment of repeatability in patients with heart failure. Wright GA; Thackray S; Howey S; Cleland JG J Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 44(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 12679390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two software in gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography, for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, in patients with and without perfusion defects. Kakhki VR; Zakavi SR; Sadeghi R Hell J Nucl Med; 2007; 10(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 17450245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with cardiofocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. Pelletier-Galarneau M; Finnerty V; Tan S; Authier S; Gregoire J; Harel F J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 29520572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planar imaging versus gated blood-pool SPECT for the assessment of ventricular performance: a multicenter study. Groch MW; DePuey EG; Belzberg AC; Erwin WD; Kamran M; Barnett CA; Hendel RC; Spies SM; Ali A; Marshall RC J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 42(12):1773-9. PubMed ID: 11752072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation. Sibille L; Bouallegue FB; Bourdon A; Micheau A; Vernhet-Kovacsik H; Mariano-Goulart D Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 21057340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of left and right ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood-pool SPECT in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: comparison with cardiac MRI. Xie BQ; Tian YQ; Zhang J; Zhao SH; Yang MF; Guo F; Wang DY; Wei HX; Chu KW; He ZX J Nucl Med; 2012 Apr; 53(4):584-91. PubMed ID: 22393224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]