These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15096378)
1. Digital photography, confidentiality, and teledermatology. Goldberg DJ Arch Dermatol; 2004 Apr; 140(4):477-8. PubMed ID: 15096378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology, and the law. Scheinfeld N Arch Dermatol; 2004 Apr; 140(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 15096377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical photography. Goldstein N Hawaii Med J; 2002 Mar; 61(3):44. PubMed ID: 11965834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Teledermatology in Department of Defense Health Services Region 10. Carlos ME; Pangelinan SI J Healthc Inf Manag; 1999; 13(4):59-69. PubMed ID: 10747703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Plea for standardization in teledermatology: a worm's eye view. Vidmar DA Telemed J; 1997; 3(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 10168282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the clinical utility of stereoscopic clinical photography. Brack CD; Kessel IL Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():42-4. PubMed ID: 18391253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practice guidelines for teledermatology in Australia. Abbott LM; Miller R; Janda M; Bennett H; Taylor M; Arnold C; Shumack S; Soyer HP; Caffery LJ Australas J Dermatol; 2020 Aug; 61(3):e293-e302. PubMed ID: 32363572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography. Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shift to digital spurs revisions in image quality standards. Zalunardo RR; Stumpf S Telemed Today; 2002; 9(2):25-6, 38. PubMed ID: 12370973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of in-person dermatology versus teledermatology. Weinstock MA J Am Acad Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 61(5):902-3; author reply 903-4. PubMed ID: 19836649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Teledermatology: a review of reliability and accuracy of diagnosis and management. Levin YS; Warshaw EM Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):163-76, vii. PubMed ID: 19254660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Telemedicine in dermatological practice: teledermatology]. Danis J; Forczek E; Bari F Orv Hetil; 2016 Mar; 157(10):363-9. PubMed ID: 26920326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A teledermatological approach to enhance diagnostic accuracy in dermatohistopathology. Schiener R; Pillekamp H; Weber L; Hartmann K; Peter RU J Telemed Telecare; 2003; 9(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 12877774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image compression in your PACS: should you do it? What are the issues? Khorasani R J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):780-1. PubMed ID: 17411700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The potential power of reference image databases and oncologic imaging. Becker GJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):565-7. PubMed ID: 17411881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of teledermatology/teledermoscopy and clinic-based dermatology for specific categories of skin neoplasms. Warshaw EM; Gravely AA; Nelson DB J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Aug; 63(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 20633809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Flight crews' use of digital cameras. Sharpe D Air Med J; 2002; 21(5):24-7. PubMed ID: 12196737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reflections on the future and usefulness of teledermatology]. de Argila D Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2008 Sep; 99(7):503-5. PubMed ID: 18682162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Advances in digital imaging in dermatology. Pak HS Adv Dermatol; 2001; 17():47-75. PubMed ID: 11758125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]