BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15096956)

  • 1. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance: comparison with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications.
    Moshkovitz Y; Kaluski E; Milo O; Vered Z; Cotter G
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2004 May; 19(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 15096956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance.
    Cotter G; Moshkovitz Y; Kaluski E; Cohen AJ; Miller H; Goor D; Vered Z
    Chest; 2004 Apr; 125(4):1431-40. PubMed ID: 15078756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics: an emphasis on bioimpedance cardiography.
    Rosenberg P; Yancy CW
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2000 May; 15(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 10952420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M; Barbee D
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioimpedance cardiography measurements of cardiac output and other cardiovascular parameters.
    Albert NM
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2006 Jun; 18(2):195-202, x. PubMed ID: 16728305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
    Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
    Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during cardiac catheterization.
    Barin E; Haryadi DG; Schookin SI; Westenskow DR; Zubenko VG; Beliaev KR; Morozov AA
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Mar; 28(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 10752817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impedance cardiography--non-invasive measurement of central hemodynamic data].
    Petersen JR; Jensen BV; Olsen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Jan; 154(5):255-60. PubMed ID: 1736457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transthoracic electrical bioimpedence cardiac output: comparison with multigated equillibrium radionuclide cardiography.
    Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Bhandopadhyaya A; Sathyaprabha TN; Janaki P; Mahalla BK; Gupta R; Banakal S; Jairaj PS
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 20229061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Leslie SJ; McKee S; Newby DE; Webb DJ; Denvir MA
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Oct; 9(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 15472501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients.
    Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure.
    Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB
    Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of cardiac output by bioimpedance cardiography.
    World MJ
    J R Army Med Corps; 1990 Jun; 136(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 2388195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac output measurement in patients with an implanted pacemaker.
    Vondra V; Halamek J; Viscor I; Jurak P; Novak M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():916-8. PubMed ID: 18002106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance with acetylene uptake for measuring cardiac output.
    Wang E; Cruz C; Pettersen MR; Hoff J; Helgerud J
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 35(11):925-32. PubMed ID: 24886928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output.
    Trinkmann F; Berger M; Doesch C; Papavassiliu T; Schoenberg SO; Borggrefe M; Kaden JJ; Saur J
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Aug; 30(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 26115774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of bioimpedance to thermodilution and echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function.
    Spinale FG; Smith AC; Crawford FA
    Crit Care Med; 1990 Apr; 18(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 2318052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography.
    Marik PE; Pendelton JE; Smith R
    Crit Care Med; 1997 Sep; 25(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9295830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impedance cardiography: more questions than answers.
    Wang DJ; Gottlieb SS
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2006 May; 8(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 17543244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. A preliminary report.
    Masaki DI; Greenspoon JS; Ouzounian JG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Sep; 161(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 2782352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.