These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15097251)

  • 21. Designing an acupuncture study to meet evidence-based medical criteria: methodological considerations for logistic design and development of treatment interventions arising from the German randomized controlled acupuncture trial on chronic shoulder pain (GRASP).
    Molsberger AF; Mau J; Gotthardt H; Schneider T; Drabik A
    Eur J Med Res; 2004 Aug; 9(8):405-11. PubMed ID: 15337631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical Research: From Case Reports to International Multicenter Clinical Trials.
    Finfer S; Cook D; Machado FR; Perner A
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Nov; 49(11):1866-1882. PubMed ID: 34387238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Impact of a Rigorous Quality Program on 3D Echocardiography Data Quality in an International Multisite Randomized Trial.
    Crowley AL; Yow E; Rabineau D; Norris C; White J; Daubert MA; Velazquez EJ; Barnhart H; Krucoff MW; Rao SV; Douglas PS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 11(12):1918-1920. PubMed ID: 30121272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Logical limits of randomized controlled trials.
    Sleigh JW
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1997 Apr; 3(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 9276590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reporting the results of randomized clinical trials: a priority of Archives of Ophthalmology.
    Beck RW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 122(7):1038-9. PubMed ID: 15249369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The CONSORT statement: will it lead to improved reporting of clinical trials in ophthalmology? Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
    Hawkins BS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 May; 117(5):677-80. PubMed ID: 10326970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Barriers to conducting randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the Horsechestnut & Venous Leg Ulcer Trial (HAVLUT).
    Leach MJ
    Contemp Nurse; 2003 Aug; 15(1-2):37-47. PubMed ID: 14649507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. TREAT: tamper-resistant envelope allocation technique for a multisite study.
    Sheeder J; Seale RA; Weber Yorga KD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():280-3. PubMed ID: 26415578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Voluntary Site Accreditation - Improving the Execution of Multicenter Clinical Trials.
    Johnston SC; Austin CP; Lewis-Hall F
    N Engl J Med; 2017 Oct; 377(15):1414-1415. PubMed ID: 29020596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Re: "Bias in clinical intervention research".
    Hemilä H
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 May; 165(10):1219; author reply 1219-20. PubMed ID: 17426041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Recommendations of the DOG to publication schemes in multi-center trials].
    Pielen A; Wilhelm B; Holz F
    Ophthalmologe; 2014 May; 111(5):498-9. PubMed ID: 24959645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Ten Have TR; Kimmel SE
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jul; 135(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 11453711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Montori V; Vist G; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Djulbegovic B; Atkins D; Falck-Ytter Y; Williams JW; Meerpohl J; Norris SL; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1277-82. PubMed ID: 21802904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dutch probiotics study is criticised for its "design, approval, and conduct".
    Sheldon T
    BMJ; 2010 Jan; 340():c77. PubMed ID: 20053835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The PROPATRIA trial: best practices at the time were followed.
    Gooszen HG;
    Lancet; 2010 Apr; 375(9722):1249-50. PubMed ID: 20362327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Multicenter study in ophthalmology--importance of epidemiological study].
    Sato Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Oct; 108(10):591-2. PubMed ID: 15559310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CLOSURE 1 seen through the MIST.
    Wilmshurst P
    BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2226. PubMed ID: 22438388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The ERSPC Quality Control Committee.
    Ciatto S
    BJU Int; 2003 Dec; 92 Suppl 2():57-61. PubMed ID: 14983957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
    Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.