These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1509773)
1. [Legal protection of the fetus in West Germany]. von Brauchitsch I Wien Med Wochenschr; 1992; (4-5):XXI-XXVI. PubMed ID: 1509773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Abortion according to paragraph 218ff. of the German penal code and life support of premature infants from the viewpoint of the pediatrician]. von Voss H Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1986 May; 134(5):232-9. PubMed ID: 3724760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States. Belling DW; Eberl C J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion: 2. Fetal status and legal representation. Dickens BM Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 124(3):253-4. PubMed ID: 7459785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The fetus between abortion and protection of life]. Ostendorf H Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1982; 40():29-33. PubMed ID: 7165649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Verdict of the Federal Constitutional Court on term regulation]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Mar; 100(12):637-9. PubMed ID: 1122805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal abortions and neonatal homicide after Roe v Wade. Lester D Psychol Rep; 1993 Feb; 72(1):46. PubMed ID: 8451372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn. King PA Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and the search for public policy. McIntyre RL Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(3):7-16. PubMed ID: 8118140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000. Arkes H Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Principles of the current legal regulations on pregnancy interruption. Results of the decision of the Federal constitutional court of 25 February, 1975]. Brenner G Dtsch Krankenpflegez; 1976 Dec; 29(12):671-6. PubMed ID: 1050226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Human dignity and conflict in pregnancy]. Jerouschek G Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1994 Oct; 88(10):755-61. PubMed ID: 7825355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A right to life for the unborn? The current debate on abortion in Germany and Norbert Hoerster's legal-philosophical justification for the right to life. Simon A J Med Philos; 2000 Apr; 25(2):220-39. PubMed ID: 10833137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Family planning--paragraph 218 StGB]. Jakob E Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1981 Sep; 43(9):421-2. PubMed ID: 6213888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework. Mangel CP Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]