These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15098532)

  • 1. Epidural analgesia using loss of resistance with air versus saline: does it make a difference? Should we reevaluate our practice?
    Norman D
    AANA J; 2003 Dec; 71(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 15098532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Labor epidural anesthetics comparing loss of resistance with air versus saline: does the choice matter?
    Norman D; Winkelman C; Hanrahan E; Hood R; Nance B
    AANA J; 2006 Aug; 74(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 16918122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dual-chambered syringe that allows identification of the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique with air and with saline.
    Candido KD; Winnie AP
    Reg Anesth; 1992; 17(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 1606099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrospective effectiveness study of loss of resistance to air or saline for identification of the epidural space.
    Segal S; Arendt KW
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Feb; 110(2):558-63. PubMed ID: 19955501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of injection of two vs 10 mL saline on the subsequent spread and quality of epidural analgesia in parturients.
    Siddik-Sayyid SM; Taha SK; Aouad MT; Daaboul DG; Deeb PG; El Khatib MF; Baraka AS
    J Clin Anesth; 2006 Dec; 18(8):575-9. PubMed ID: 17175425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Success of spinal and epidural labor analgesia: comparison of loss of resistance technique using air versus saline in combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia technique.
    Grondin LS; Nelson K; Ross V; Aponte O; Lee S; Pan PH
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 19512882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss of resistance to normal saline is preferred to identify the epidural space: a survey of Canadian pediatric anesthesiologists.
    Ames WA; Hayes JA; Pétroz GC; Roy WL
    Can J Anaesth; 2005; 52(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 15983146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Techniques for identifying the epidural space].
    Figueredo E
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005; 52(7):401-12. PubMed ID: 16200920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paraesthesia with lumbar epidural catheters. A comparison of air and saline in a loss-of-resistance technique.
    Sarna MC; Smith I; James JM
    Anaesthesia; 1990 Dec; 45(12):1077-9. PubMed ID: 2278336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of the epidural space: stop using the loss of resistance to air technique!
    Van de Velde M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2006; 57(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 16617758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for using air or fluid when identifying the epidural space.
    Sanford CL; Rodriguez RE; Schmidt J; Austin PN
    AANA J; 2013 Feb; 81(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 23513320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The learning curve associated with the epidural technique using the Episure™ AutoDetect™ versus conventional glass syringe: an open-label, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of experienced anesthesiologists in obstetric patients.
    Carabuena JM; Mitani AM; Liu X; Kodali BS; Tsen LC
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Jan; 116(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 23223103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intravenous remifentanil vs. epidural levobupivacaine with fentanyl for pain relief in early labour: a randomised, controlled, double-blinded study.
    Volmanen P; Sarvela J; Akural EI; Raudaskoski T; Korttila K; Alahuhta S
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Feb; 52(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 18005381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidural space identification: a meta-analysis of complications after air versus liquid as the medium for loss of resistance.
    Schier R; Guerra D; Aguilar J; Pratt GF; Hernandez M; Boddu K; Riedel B
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Dec; 109(6):2012-21. PubMed ID: 19923534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of epidural space by drip method.
    Michel MZ; Lawes EG
    Reg Anesth; 1991; 16(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 1911502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loss-of-resistance technique using both air and saline.
    Barros S
    Reg Anesth; 1995; 20(5):462-3. PubMed ID: 8519731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predistention of the epidural space before catheter insertion reduces the incidence of intravascular epidural catheter insertion.
    Evron S; Gladkov V; Sessler DI; Khazin V; Sadan O; Boaz M; Ezri T
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Aug; 105(2):460-4. PubMed ID: 17646506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 'membrane in syringe' technique that allows identification of the epidural space with saline while avoids injection of air into the epidural space.
    Lin BC; Chen KB; Chang CS; Wu KC; Liu YC; Chen CC; Wu RS
    Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2002 Jun; 40(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 12194391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Air versus saline.
    Burbidge MJ; Gunning P
    Anaesthesia; 1997 Oct; 52(10):1021-2. PubMed ID: 9370862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does epidural injection of physiological saline facilitate the advancement of catheters?
    Geernaert K; Hody JL; Adriaensen H; Van Steenberge A
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 11767424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.