These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15099126)

  • 1. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.
    Fox CR
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 10090802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory.
    Rottenstreich Y; Tversky A
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):406-15. PubMed ID: 9127585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: the more, the riskier.
    Price PC; Smith AR; Lench HC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 16594826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partition-edit-count: naive extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability.
    Fox CR; Levav J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):626-42. PubMed ID: 15584810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unpacking unpacking: greater detail can reduce perceived likelihood.
    Redden JP; Frederick S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 21261417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision-tree models of categorization response times, choice proportions, and typicality judgments.
    Lafond D; Lacouture Y; Cohen AL
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):833-55. PubMed ID: 19839685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judgments of cause and blame: the effects of intentionality and foreseeability.
    Lagnado DA; Channon S
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):754-70. PubMed ID: 18706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support.
    Brenner LA; Koehler DJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):16-47. PubMed ID: 10090797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgments under uncertainty: representativeness or potential surprise?
    Fisk JE
    Br J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 93(Pt 4):431-49. PubMed ID: 12519527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
    Redelmeier DA; Koehler DJ; Liberman V; Tversky A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7564936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.
    Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).
    Murdock B
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 16802885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgment dissociation theory: an analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning.
    Mandel DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):419-34. PubMed ID: 13678376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aging and conditional probability judgments: a global matching approach.
    Spaniol J; Bayen UJ
    Psychol Aging; 2005 Mar; 20(1):165-81. PubMed ID: 15769222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.